Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Maybe So

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on April 8, 2002 17:08:21 UTC

Aurino,

The point of the matter is that science provides the most up-to-date view of all that we know. We can either choose that with the tentativeness that it deserves (i.e., where evidence is lacking), or we can elect to hold views that are in opposition to the directions that modern theories point us. If we do that, then more likely than not we will be the ones in the history books as being cast as close-minded, and not the scientists who elicited possible answers to the questions on the forefront of scientific unanswered questions.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins