Blackholes Discussion Forum - Hosted by The Astronomy Net

Blackholes Discussion Forum
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I	Login

[ Collapse Threads ][ Start New Topic Thread ]

Thread 965 through 936 of 965 in the moderated blackholes forum
Next 30

Black Holes and the relation of Matter and Anti Matter - mattmott16 - May 1, 2008 - 03:34 UTC
Time waits for no hole - bitingenius - April 22, 2008 - 19:33 UTC
Black Holes and static photon packets - wolf359 - December 3, 2007 - 01:00 UTC
Black Holes and RedShift - brooksquest - October 3, 2007 - 12:58 UTC
Blackholes= cosmic vortex - astro55 - September 9, 2007 - 22:13 UTC
What Is Wrong With This? - xxbrodstaxx - August 25, 2007 - 01:31 UTC
Sir Isaac Newton, and inter-conversion of mass – energy (E=mc2 ) - physicsajay - July 23, 2007 - 12:57 UTC
The origine of the singularity in the space-time - daloka - July 5, 2007 - 13:56 UTC
BlackHoles-or-Black "Stars" - starguy32 - May 9, 2007 - 22:39 UTC
4-DspaceTimeGravity - becktor - December 27, 2006 - 22:28 UTC
The “space-time” isn’t actual reality - vlade - December 23, 2006 - 11:08 UTC
I believe you are thinking about these the wrong way. - yondee - November 14, 2006 - 19:49 UTC
- My mistake, heres the right link - yondee - November 15, 2006 - 22:09 UTC
The real Theory about the Black Holes - hershko - November 2, 2006 - 05:46 UTC
hbar=e^2/e0c - garrydenke - June 7, 2005 - 14:05 UTC
Ideas on black holes - dnatech - May 14, 2005 - 06:56 UTC
- Hawking radiation - yanniru - May 15, 2005 - 00:54 UTC
  - There is no requirement... - bruce - May 16, 2005 - 03:41 UTC
  - Space inside the black hole - dnatech - May 16, 2005 - 18:00 UTC
    - The event horizon is pure time. - yanniru - May 17, 2005 - 11:57 UTC
  - Further noting.... - dnatech - May 16, 2005 - 18:42 UTC
    - Relationships please - yanniru - May 17, 2005 - 12:01 UTC
      - I am confusing myself and others - dnatech - May 18, 2005 - 04:48 UTC
- Conceptualization on gravity - dnatech - May 15, 2005 - 10:25 UTC
Question on how black hole sees infalling matter - dnatech - May 13, 2005 - 07:36 UTC
THEORIES MASS TO MASS ROTATION - homoii - April 25, 2005 - 17:09 UTC
Acoustic Black Holes - yanniru - March 10, 2005 - 13:43 UTC
black hole theory - astronomy124 - February 24, 2005 - 04:47 UTC
- Gravity always attracts - bazukaz - March 7, 2005 - 19:28 UTC
- Gravity at Maximum - gherreram - May 5, 2005 - 19:38 UTC
  - If light cannot escape, how can gravity? - yanniru - May 6, 2005 - 12:45 UTC
orbiting light retrieval? - heavy - February 18, 2005 - 00:32 UTC
- Use light radited from stars orbiting the black hole - yanniru - February 21, 2005 - 01:02 UTC
  - impossible - heavy - February 25, 2005 - 23:59 UTC
    - Right - bazukaz - March 7, 2005 - 19:31 UTC
    - Yes= no possible probe - yanniru - March 8, 2005 - 03:40 UTC
Big Flash Theory - Evolution - ggraphix - February 9, 2005 - 00:51 UTC
- youre right - bazukaz - February 11, 2005 - 20:27 UTC
Intial universe's density ->BH ? - bazukaz - February 1, 2005 - 20:39 UTC
- No Higgs particles - yanniru - February 1, 2005 - 23:20 UTC
  - Seems reasonable - bazukaz - February 13, 2005 - 22:39 UTC
    - You are not alone - wandaqueen - February 16, 2005 - 13:53 UTC
  - Higgs particles ??? - bazukaz - February 18, 2005 - 01:05 UTC
    - Only mass - wandaqueen - February 23, 2005 - 16:06 UTC
- Good question. - duordi - February 2, 2005 - 20:43 UTC
Worm holes - duordi - January 29, 2005 - 16:28 UTC
- All photons experience this worm hole - wandaqueen - January 30, 2005 - 01:04 UTC
  - Only if ...... - duordi - January 31, 2005 - 19:26 UTC
    - It happens without the mirror - secretary - February 1, 2005 - 03:59 UTC
      - They need the mirror.... - duordi - February 2, 2005 - 19:04 UTC
        
        there are two different situations here! - interested14 - February 12, 2006 - 07:56 UTC
    - No. The mirror has nothing to do with it - wandaqueen - February 1, 2005 - 12:34 UTC
Black hole's density - bazukaz - December 24, 2004 - 23:44 UTC
- Infinite Indeed - splat - January 9, 2005 - 08:07 UTC
  - So how can we calculate the mass of the BH? - bazukaz - January 25, 2005 - 14:00 UTC
    - Gravity is the weakest force of all - secretary - January 25, 2005 - 18:53 UTC
      - Singularity - bazukaz - January 25, 2005 - 23:19 UTC
        
        Only in theory - secretary - January 26, 2005 - 02:15 UTC
        
        Only in theory - bazukaz - January 26, 2005 - 09:43 UTC
        
        Event Horizons Cut Us Off - splat - January 30, 2005 - 06:17 UTC
- It’s a mathematical trick. - duordi - January 21, 2005 - 14:48 UTC
  - Math incorrect - wandaqueen - January 21, 2005 - 15:01 UTC
    - So true - duordi - January 27, 2005 - 23:10 UTC
      - It is still unknown - wandaqueen - January 28, 2005 - 02:57 UTC
        
        Beginner quantum - duordi - January 29, 2005 - 15:38 UTC
        
        Re: Begginner quantum - wandaqueen - January 30, 2005 - 00:56 UTC
        
        Oh? - duordi - January 30, 2005 - 03:25 UTC
        
        Statments I disagree with - wandaqueen - February 1, 2005 - 13:13 UTC
        
        Rest mass - duordi - February 8, 2005 - 15:31 UTC
why we can't see inside a blackhole? - attitudefever - December 15, 2004 - 20:30 UTC
- There is not enough time to see inside - yanniru - December 16, 2004 - 03:53 UTC
  - ohh i get it - attitudefever - December 16, 2004 - 09:32 UTC
Density of a BlackHole from its Radius - attitudefever - December 15, 2004 - 19:56 UTC
- dimensional analysis - yanniru - December 16, 2004 - 03:58 UTC
  - no there's another mistake - attitudefever - December 16, 2004 - 09:38 UTC
bringing this up top.... - sagefr0g - November 15, 2004 - 02:39 UTC
- My opinion is that only waves are entities - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 03:21 UTC
  - excepting for the classical sense - sagefr0g - November 15, 2004 - 03:39 UTC
    - Classical theory of particles - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 13:06 UTC
      - Another coincidence - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 13:31 UTC
        
        ...or i-i-is it? - carefuluniverse - November 17, 2004 - 04:20 UTC
        
        Ruquist is right - wandaqueen - January 22, 2005 - 03:33 UTC
        
        Ruquist very well might BE anonymous Wandaqueen - kantolfir2 - January 22, 2005 - 20:31 UTC
        
        Mike is just illiterate about science - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 04:04 UTC
        
        Devise a proof which will satisfy an unfair, anonymous person - kantolfir2 - January 23, 2005 - 04:28 UTC
        
        That's no proof - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 14:08 UTC
        
        The alleged question was not asked coherently - carefuluniverse - January 23, 2005 - 23:06 UTC
        
        What is the matter? - wandaqueen - January 24, 2005 - 02:51 UTC
        
        Anonymous Wandaqueen requested proof then dropped the ball - kantolfir2 - January 27, 2005 - 18:51 UTC
        
        My preference - wandaqueen - January 27, 2005 - 19:27 UTC
        
        Why not find out for sure? - duordi - November 24, 2004 - 03:18 UTC
        
        Sure it has.... - bruce - November 24, 2004 - 20:50 UTC
        
        Bruce is right. - duordi - November 25, 2004 - 15:13 UTC
      - There is no evidence in the double... - bruce - November 15, 2004 - 20:11 UTC
  - QED - bruce - November 15, 2004 - 04:18 UTC
Duane- This is your kind of theory - yanniru - November 9, 2004 - 16:25 UTC
- Interesting. - duordi - November 10, 2004 - 05:02 UTC
Universe deep internal relation----earth center "empty hole" - xszxsz - October 24, 2004 - 23:48 UTC
- One idea at a time is enough for me. - duordi - October 26, 2004 - 03:48 UTC
Important find:when is the wave-motion of light?and when the - xszxsz - October 24, 2004 - 23:47 UTC
- The unfortunate truth - duordi - October 25, 2004 - 01:34 UTC
  - reply Duane - xszxsz - October 26, 2004 - 00:06 UTC
    - Measurements will not agree with you. - duordi - October 26, 2004 - 02:22 UTC
  - reply Duane - xszxsz - October 26, 2004 - 00:31 UTC
    - Hard to believe, yes! - duordi - October 26, 2004 - 02:45 UTC
  - " Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of - xszxsz - October 26, 2004 - 03:09 UTC
    - "must replace" why? - duordi - October 26, 2004 - 03:33 UTC
- correct wrong word - xszxsz - October 26, 2004 - 06:01 UTC

Thread 965 through 936 of 965 in the moderated blackholes forum
Next 30Login to Post

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2007 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins