Re: Re: Scientific Currency - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Re: Scientific Currency

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on January 29, 2001 21:47:22 UTC

Disagree. Can you built a house with a religion? A computer? A car? Can you fight even a primitive a desease without science of evolution? Can you navigate a ship without science? Can you even communicate (not even over the globe on a forum like this, but across a block only) without a science?

Sorry, fellas, but only fool can equate useless and misleading religions and usefull (and thus powerfull) science.

Follow Ups:

Alexander, we still need something superficial - richard - January 29, 2001 - 21:49 UTC
- Re: We still need something superficial - gobeo - January 29, 2001 - 22:50 UTC
  - Re: Re: We still need something superficial - alexander - January 29, 2001 - 23:05 UTC
  - Not the earth was flat thing again! - richard - January 30, 2001 - 02:35 UTC
    - Re: Not the earth was flat thing again! - alexander - January 30, 2001 - 03:49 UTC
    - Re: Not the earth was flat thing again! - comet61 - January 30, 2001 - 03:59 UTC
      - Re: Re: Not the earth was flat thing again! - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 02:52 UTC
        
        Be sure though, that there are plenty of atheists... - richard - February 1, 2001 - 04:03 UTC
        
        Yeah, but... - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 19:27 UTC
        
        Re: Yeah, but... - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 20:49 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Yeah, but... - stormcrow - February 2, 2001 - 00:23 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Yeah, but... - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 01:08 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, but... - stormcrow - February 2, 2001 - 02:28 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, but... - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 03:13 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, but... - stormcrow - February 2, 2001 - 03:36 UTC
        
        What is God(s)? - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 19:30 UTC
        
        Re: What is God(s)? - stormcrow - February 2, 2001 - 21:44 UTC
        
        Re: Re: What is God(s)? - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 21:53 UTC
        
        *Exasperated sigh* - stormcrow - February 3, 2001 - 01:20 UTC
        
        Re: *Exasperated sigh* - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 05:43 UTC
        
        look closer - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 16:24 UTC
        
        Yes, let's look closer. - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 19:21 UTC
        
        first give me a number - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 19:51 UTC
        
        Re: first give me a number - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 20:15 UTC
        
        Very fine. - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 21:26 UTC
        
        Yeah, but... - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 19:29 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Not the earth was flat thing again! - blnelsonusa - February 1, 2001 - 14:39 UTC
        
        Please elaborate. - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 19:23 UTC
- guess i'm bankrupt, then... - gwynj - January 30, 2001 - 01:47 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Scientific Currency/Alexander - blnelsonusa - January 30, 2001 - 14:04 UTC
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Scientific Currency/Alexander - alexander - January 30, 2001 - 20:16 UTC
  - The Realm of Pure Idea - blnelsonusa - January 30, 2001 - 23:27 UTC
    - Re: The Realm of Pure Idea - alexander - January 31, 2001 - 00:00 UTC
      - True Enlightenment - blnelsonusa - January 31, 2001 - 05:33 UTC
        
        Re: True Enlightenment - alexander - January 31, 2001 - 21:18 UTC
        
        An Agnostic Stance - blnelsonusa - January 31, 2001 - 23:13 UTC
        
        Re: An Agnostic Stance - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 03:44 UTC
        
        Re: Re: An Agnostic Stance - blnelsonusa - February 1, 2001 - 04:19 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: An Agnostic Stance - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 10:34 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: An Agnostic Stance - blnelsonusa - February 1, 2001 - 13:53 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: An Agnostic Stance - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 14:37 UTC
        
        No offense, Ben, but... - stormcrow - February 2, 2001 - 03:51 UTC
        
        Higher Vantage Points - blnelsonusa - February 2, 2001 - 14:08 UTC
        
        Fact - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 19:21 UTC
        
        Re: Fact - blnelsonusa - February 2, 2001 - 19:55 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Fact - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 20:11 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Fact - blnelsonusa - February 2, 2001 - 20:25 UTC
        
        Crisis of education. - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 21:19 UTC
        
        Wait a second! - richard - February 2, 2001 - 20:10 UTC
        
        Re: Wait a second! - blnelsonusa - February 2, 2001 - 20:38 UTC
        
        Boxy minding. - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 20:45 UTC
        
        Alexander, I must say you are over-stepping it here. - richard - February 2, 2001 - 23:04 UTC
        
        Cristian brothers teaching physics? - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 00:55 UTC
        
        Alexander, You know are rated at the level of Jisbond!!! - richard - February 3, 2001 - 03:14 UTC
        
        Who cares about rating here? - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 04:06 UTC
        
        a word to the wise, if i may - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 21:50 UTC
        
        Of course, it is easier to read Bible than to learn. - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 23:33 UTC
        
        to clarify - gwynj - February 4, 2001 - 02:07 UTC
        
        Oh, come on, now. - stormcrow - February 3, 2001 - 03:29 UTC
        
        Adam and evolution? This is something new. - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 04:29 UTC
        
        Re: Adam and evolution? This is something new. - stormcrow - February 3, 2001 - 04:35 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Adam and evolution? This is something new. - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 05:32 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Adam and evolution? This is something new. - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 05:54 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Adam and evolution? This is something new. - stormcrow - February 3, 2001 - 12:13 UTC
        
        maybe if put this way - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 16:33 UTC
        
        Re: maybe if put this way - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 19:17 UTC
        
        Re: Re: maybe if put this way - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 20:13 UTC
        
        Reading the Holy Bible, I found the following: - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 22:17 UTC
        
        Re: Reading the Holy Bible, I found the following: - gwynj - February 4, 2001 - 01:59 UTC
        
        Lack of knowledge is good? - alexander - February 4, 2001 - 03:29 UTC
        
        Let's start with The Basics, ok? - gwynj - February 4, 2001 - 14:39 UTC
        
        you might consider - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 01:34 UTC
        
        Re: you might consider - alexander - February 3, 2001 - 02:52 UTC
        
        Nice Argument - stormcrow - February 3, 2001 - 03:13 UTC
        
        Re: Nice Argument - blnelsonusa - February 5, 2001 - 13:52 UTC
        
        Re: Re: you might consider - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 15:57 UTC
        
        Leaps of Faith vs. Hops of Faith, Jumping to Conclusions - stormcrow - February 2, 2001 - 21:58 UTC
        
        every person is different - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 01:25 UTC
        
        Re: every person is different - stormcrow - February 3, 2001 - 03:20 UTC
        
        close - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 15:40 UTC
        
        Well... - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 02:48 UTC
        
        Re: Well... - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 03:32 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Well... - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 19:22 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Well... - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 20:39 UTC
        
        see my 'what is the difference thread' - gwynj - February 5, 2001 - 00:31 UTC
        
        Re: Well... - blnelsonusa - February 1, 2001 - 04:43 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Well... - stormcrow - February 1, 2001 - 19:20 UTC
      - how about this... - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 01:58 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins