First of all Motumos, not to be rude, but you may want to think about what you're saying before you say it. Indeed scientists have been wrong in the past, but it doesn't mean they are always wrong.

Mario, you said the theory of evolution has been proved. Can you prove this to me with sources? I have never found proof of it and I have several, up to date books, that highly disagree with the theory. Indeed evolution does occur, but I don't think the theory of evolution (change of one species to another) has occured.

Also you said, acording to the bible, the earth is 6000 years old. This is NOT true. Acording to the bible, it has been aproximately 6000 years since Adam was created. The word "day" used is a translation from a Hebrew word with different meanings. Even stated in Genesis 2:17, "But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the DAY you eat from it you will positively die." The bible tells us Adam lived for over 900 years, which indicates the day means something different than 24 hours. The Hebrew word translated "day" has a variety of meanings, including "a long time; the time covering an extraordinary event." The term used allows for the thought that each "day" could have been thousands of years, if not more, in length.

This may also indicate plant and animal life are much older than humans by more than just a couple days.

• Evolution - stormcrow - July 4, 2001 - 17:45 UTC
  • There is not evidence and has never been evidence of Darwins.... - motumos - July 4, 2001 - 17:50 UTC
    • I can name and show you evidence of colors in between other colo - motumos - July 4, 2001 - 18:18 UTC
      • The fossile record is one thing - highvoltage - July 5, 2001 - 06:17 UTC
        • I have studied both Anthropology, and biology, and non exist. - motumos - July 5, 2001 - 13:53 UTC
          • Archeaopteryx and Archaeornyx - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 18:40 UTC
      • It's common sense - stormcrow - July 5, 2001 - 13:53 UTC
        • Listen to yourslef man..??!!?? - motumos - July 5, 2001 - 15:42 UTC
          • If you were indeed studying biology, you knew - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 17:24 UTC
            • A wolf is the same species as a dog. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:52 UTC
              • No, I did NOT study biology in depth. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 17:36 UTC
                • But the same question is applied, Atheists don't prove a thing.. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:00 UTC
              • Biology Help - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 17:48 UTC
            • Also, you seem to be describing adaptation, not evolution. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:56 UTC
              • Hair and nails are one thing, appendix and coccyx are another - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 02:11 UTC
          • I think you're a little misguided - stormcrow - July 5, 2001 - 18:32 UTC
            • Humans are the only species with mitochondrial DNA and - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:37 UTC
              • I'll clarify a little - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 01:56 UTC
                • But you see, It hasn't ever been proven. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:56 UTC
                • Also, what followed a different path? - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:59 UTC
                  • Boy, is this dark ages discussion or what? - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 19:03 UTC
                • Problem with your analogy - isaiaha41 - July 7, 2001 - 13:32 UTC
                  • I will admit that evolution seems to have driving force - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:49 UTC
                    • Darwins Theory of evolution is also jumping to conclusions storm - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:21 UTC
                    • Two sides to that coin - isaiaha41 - July 8, 2001 - 13:52 UTC
                      • I agree - stormcrow - July 8, 2001 - 23:26 UTC
                        • No god(s), Santa(s), etc. beings are needed. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 19:44 UTC
                          • It's just a suspicion - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 19:54 UTC
                            • Mario, my post is not for you. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 20:19 UTC
                              • Okay (nt) - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 20:36 UTC
            • Yeah, God did it. - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 18:59 UTC
              • Yasir, please use word "math" instead of "god" . - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 19:29 UTC
                • I really love it - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 19:42 UTC
                • But that doesn't prove evolution, only adaptation.... AGAIN!! - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:08 UTC
                  • What's the difference between adaptation and evolution? - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 00:07 UTC
    • Read my post again - stormcrow - July 5, 2001 - 13:50 UTC
      • Thats not what you said, and you know it. - motumos - July 5, 2001 - 15:26 UTC
        • Evolution is false? What century are you from? - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 17:47 UTC
          • Not species changing - highvoltage - July 5, 2001 - 18:09 UTC
            • Yeah, it is - stormcrow - July 5, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
              • Species (DNA) change constantly. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 00:19 UTC
              • you describe adaptation once again, confusing with evolution.WOW - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 02:11 UTC
                • As I understand it, evolution is a result of adaptation - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 02:30 UTC
                  • Adaptaion is different then Evolution. Darwin made it confusing. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 04:07 UTC
                    • Adaptation LEADS to evolution - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 04:21 UTC
                      • No it doesn't, - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:10 UTC
                        • Species?? - doctordick - July 6, 2001 - 14:17 UTC
                          • The conclusion is clear: Darvin is right. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 21:16 UTC
                            • Current DNA changes have not proven Darwin right, more like Wron - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:13 UTC
                              • So, where do all species come from then, Motumos? - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 19:58 UTC
                            • Thank you for that - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 01:57 UTC
          • Alexander wrong again. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 02:02 UTC
            • Are you blind to facts or just plain ignorant? - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 20:54 UTC
              • Clarification - harvey1 - July 6, 2001 - 22:55 UTC
              • You need to study more. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:24 UTC
                • oh, and about humans history... - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:31 UTC
                  • That was a desperate response - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 02:28 UTC
                    • not very wrong from the truth. - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 04:13 UTC
                      • I don't know about that - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:30 UTC
                        • Elements are exposed to many elements and radiation. - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:42 UTC
                          • Bible is incorrect again. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 21:29 UTC
                            • Apparently you haven't read the bible carefully! - highvoltage - July 10, 2001 - 16:25 UTC
                              • What about the Orthodox Jews - yanniru - July 10, 2001 - 17:00 UTC
                                • Please explain - highvoltage - July 11, 2001 - 04:44 UTC
                                  • From the Torah - yanniru - July 11, 2001 - 12:09 UTC
                                    • Sources? - highvoltage - July 12, 2001 - 04:49 UTC
                                      • You have to speak with an Orthadox Jew - yanniru - July 12, 2001 - 21:37 UTC
                        • carbon-dating not accurate more than several thous yrs back - isaiaha41 - July 8, 2001 - 19:06 UTC
                          • How can carbon sample be contaminated? - alexander - July 10, 2001 - 17:49 UTC
                            • Soot - doctordick - July 12, 2001 - 23:32 UTC
                • Dammit, adaptation LEADS to evolution - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 02:24 UTC
                  • Here's a contradiction you athiets even try to use as proof of E - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 04:04 UTC
                    • How do you figure? - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:26 UTC
                      • Not exactly. - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:54 UTC
                        • What? - harvey1 - July 9, 2001 - 18:11 UTC
                    • This is not a theist/atheist controversy - harvey1 - July 9, 2001 - 18:07 UTC