You are not trying to say "Darwings theory of evolution" is the same as "Adaptation". So why try to say that they are both the same? If a dark person from Africa looks so deferent from a light skined european, that is still the same species, and this is "adaptation", which is completely different than "Darwins Theory of evolution".

Darwings theory of evolution is saying that all life was created by itself and that it started from one single species, and that it is a continous process. Darwings theory of evolution is false for several reasons which I already posted in my previous posts and I don't want to keep going in circles.

• Evolution is false? What century are you from? - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 17:47 UTC
  • Not species changing - highvoltage - July 5, 2001 - 18:09 UTC
    • Yeah, it is - stormcrow - July 5, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
      • Species (DNA) change constantly. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 00:19 UTC
      • you describe adaptation once again, confusing with evolution.WOW - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 02:11 UTC
        • As I understand it, evolution is a result of adaptation - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 02:30 UTC
          • Adaptaion is different then Evolution. Darwin made it confusing. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 04:07 UTC
            • Adaptation LEADS to evolution - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 04:21 UTC
              • No it doesn't, - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:10 UTC
                • Species?? - doctordick - July 6, 2001 - 14:17 UTC
                  • The conclusion is clear: Darvin is right. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 21:16 UTC
                    • Current DNA changes have not proven Darwin right, more like Wron - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:13 UTC
                      • So, where do all species come from then, Motumos? - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 19:58 UTC
                    • Thank you for that - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 01:57 UTC
  • Alexander wrong again. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 02:02 UTC
    • Are you blind to facts or just plain ignorant? - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 20:54 UTC
      • Clarification - harvey1 - July 6, 2001 - 22:55 UTC
      • You need to study more. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:24 UTC
        • oh, and about humans history... - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:31 UTC
          • That was a desperate response - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 02:28 UTC
            • not very wrong from the truth. - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 04:13 UTC
              • I don't know about that - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:30 UTC
                • Elements are exposed to many elements and radiation. - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:42 UTC
                  • Bible is incorrect again. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 21:29 UTC
                    • Apparently you haven't read the bible carefully! - highvoltage - July 10, 2001 - 16:25 UTC
                      • What about the Orthodox Jews - yanniru - July 10, 2001 - 17:00 UTC
                        • Please explain - highvoltage - July 11, 2001 - 04:44 UTC
                          • From the Torah - yanniru - July 11, 2001 - 12:09 UTC
                            • Sources? - highvoltage - July 12, 2001 - 04:49 UTC
                              • You have to speak with an Orthadox Jew - yanniru - July 12, 2001 - 21:37 UTC
                • carbon-dating not accurate more than several thous yrs back - isaiaha41 - July 8, 2001 - 19:06 UTC
                  • How can carbon sample be contaminated? - alexander - July 10, 2001 - 17:49 UTC
                    • Soot - doctordick - July 12, 2001 - 23:32 UTC
        • Dammit, adaptation LEADS to evolution - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 02:24 UTC
          • Here's a contradiction you athiets even try to use as proof of E - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 04:04 UTC
            • How do you figure? - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:26 UTC
              • Not exactly. - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:54 UTC
                • What? - harvey1 - July 9, 2001 - 18:11 UTC
            • This is not a theist/atheist controversy - harvey1 - July 9, 2001 - 18:07 UTC