"Species are constantly blending. Homo Habilus, Homo Erectus, Homo Sapiens. It's a linear progression"

No, they are not blending. Where does the human blend with the monkey?
They are still diferent species. Did you know that what "darwinism" Scientist's so called "Homosapien" closest to man has a brain So different, that if the world's best teacher, tried to teach the monkey algebra, the monkey would never, ever, learn it? Besides the lack of the mitochondrial DNA, and the numerous other "traits", The Monkey doesn't have, it is way to different than a human.

How would you suggest species came into being? Was there a flash of light and suddenly chickens began to walk the earth? I think not."

Isn't that athiests own belief? Lighting struck on some water and suddenly your ancesters were made?

• If you were indeed studying biology, you knew - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 17:24 UTC
  • A wolf is the same species as a dog. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:52 UTC
    • No, I did NOT study biology in depth. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 17:36 UTC
      • But the same question is applied, Atheists don't prove a thing.. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:00 UTC
    • Biology Help - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 17:48 UTC
  • Also, you seem to be describing adaptation, not evolution. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:56 UTC
    • Hair and nails are one thing, appendix and coccyx are another - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 02:11 UTC
• I think you're a little misguided - stormcrow - July 5, 2001 - 18:32 UTC
  • Humans are the only species with mitochondrial DNA and - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:37 UTC
    • I'll clarify a little - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 01:56 UTC
      • But you see, It hasn't ever been proven. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:56 UTC
      • Also, what followed a different path? - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:59 UTC
        • Boy, is this dark ages discussion or what? - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 19:03 UTC
      • Problem with your analogy - isaiaha41 - July 7, 2001 - 13:32 UTC
        • I will admit that evolution seems to have driving force - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:49 UTC
          • Darwins Theory of evolution is also jumping to conclusions storm - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:21 UTC
          • Two sides to that coin - isaiaha41 - July 8, 2001 - 13:52 UTC
            • I agree - stormcrow - July 8, 2001 - 23:26 UTC
              • No god(s), Santa(s), etc. beings are needed. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 19:44 UTC
                • It's just a suspicion - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 19:54 UTC
                  • Mario, my post is not for you. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 20:19 UTC
                    • Okay (nt) - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 20:36 UTC
  • Yeah, God did it. - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 18:59 UTC
    • Yasir, please use word "math" instead of "god" . - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 19:29 UTC
      • I really love it - iamnotagenius - July 6, 2001 - 19:42 UTC
      • But that doesn't prove evolution, only adaptation.... AGAIN!! - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 23:08 UTC
        • What's the difference between adaptation and evolution? - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 00:07 UTC