Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Don't Know About That

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on July 7, 2001 13:30:33 UTC

Regardless of the calendar used, an earth-year is an earth-year. You may claim that the year is 4620, or 2001, or 5, or 204823. But the length of a year stays the same. It's one revolution around the sun, it is not a subjective measurement.

"Also, how would scientists even know how long something has been in earth? This is not very acurate because even though they used, heat, dust, gas, etc to based their experiments, they never know just what kind of gas the elements was exposed to, how much heat, for how long etc."

Carbon has a very specific half-life. It's not a measurement of gas and dust, it's a measurement of the current strength of carbon radiation extrapolated back through time. And it's quite accurate.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins