Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Humans Are The Only Species With Mitochondrial DNA And

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Motumos on July 6, 2001 01:37:37 UTC

You seem to be confused about the term species. As you said, Species is a word invented by man, but do you know why? Species is used to define the kind, and it is true that if a certain species can mate, then they are considered the same species and if they can't, they are another species. I never argued against that, but you guys are saying that humans are different species within each other which is totally false since they have the ability to mate. Humans are very mush different, but they are still the same species. You seem to have confused race with species maybe? A wolf can mate with a dog, and I never heard of anyone claiming that a wolf was not the same species of a dog.

Also, you say today's monkeys are not what humans evolved from? Does that even make sense? Shouldn't monkeys look more and more closely yo humans according to your theory of evolution? Instead, you are saying that monkeys are moving away from the human speices which is a totally contradiction to the theory of evolution, or where is the monkey species that links?

Even thousands of years ago, to today, there has never been any evidence of any other type of monkeys linking humans to them. Thats not all, no other species has been proved to be linked to any other species.

If somehow the monkey links that linked humans to them somehow disapeared out of the face of the earth, why is there not one other single species linking any others?

If evolution was an on going thing which is claimed by darwnism, why hasn't any species been proven to this day?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins