It amazes me of the outright prejudice shown by those who do not want to believe in God. They tell you its science, or they tell you it is philosophy, but point to science or point to philosophical arguments that support theism and they will deny it to the bone. You would think it is simply a matter of being open-minded, but there is no open-mind with many. Who is really open-minded and who is simply sold onto the dogma of their secular beliefs?

• Simply because gods (as Sant Clauses) do not exist. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:51 UTC
  • I don't think this is your reason - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:13 UTC
    • look closely? - xion03 - January 21, 2002 - 23:15 UTC
      • Jeremy, do you know that Home Sapiens is just one of 16 hominids - alexander - January 22, 2002 - 14:45 UTC
        • That number is not decided upon - harvey1 - January 22, 2002 - 15:34 UTC
          • So, we were just one out of many in fight for survival. - alexander - January 22, 2002 - 16:05 UTC
            • The end of evolution - yanniru - January 23, 2002 - 15:06 UTC
              • You are right but...... - ymateen - January 23, 2002 - 16:51 UTC
                • Selection process is so influenced - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 00:26 UTC
              • Gaining weight = 'Going postal'? - luis_hamburgh - January 24, 2002 - 00:13 UTC
                • The fat guy justified his aggression - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 00:21 UTC
                  • So, basicly "devil" is what we don't like. - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 00:57 UTC
                    • Something that's been bugging me for a while - stormcrow - January 25, 2002 - 06:11 UTC
                      • Agreement with Alexander - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 14:25 UTC
                        • Might makes Right? - doctordick - January 25, 2002 - 16:09 UTC
                          • Dick is mighty - luis_hamburgh - January 25, 2002 - 23:21 UTC
                            • W.E.B. Du Bois is mighty. - something - January 26, 2002 - 20:42 UTC
                              • Except to say "1903" not "9013" - something - January 26, 2002 - 20:43 UTC
                          • neither word has precise scientific application - something - January 26, 2002 - 04:09 UTC
                          • Shocking info. on "evil" - dolphin - January 27, 2002 - 04:57 UTC
                        • addie and joe - something - January 25, 2002 - 17:22 UTC
                        • Pragmatic considerations of evil - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 17:59 UTC
                          • The ends justify the means - yanniru - January 26, 2002 - 14:26 UTC
                            • No, the ends are just the ends - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 17:33 UTC
                              • Interesting analysis. "If it is 'true', it is true" - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 00:17 UTC
                                • WTC is understandable - yanniru - January 27, 2002 - 18:46 UTC
                                  • I don't see it that way - harvey1 - January 28, 2002 - 15:10 UTC
                            • That's right, true is true - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:20 UTC
                              • So, basicly religion is uselress in search for "true". - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 04:51 UTC
                                • God's logic? - dolphin - January 27, 2002 - 05:41 UTC
                            • More on God's justice - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 07:44 UTC
                              • So, no explanation why children die? And no protection? - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 17:12 UTC
                                • Read my post then, Alex - dolphin - January 28, 2002 - 08:09 UTC
                              • Maybe you are making more than the analogy allows (nt) - harvey1 - January 29, 2002 - 01:53 UTC
                          • I have a different understanding - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 17:43 UTC
              • Richard, can you define "evil forces"? Are they physical forces? - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 18:22 UTC
                • Just an adjective - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 00:05 UTC
      • Don't take it as an offence but...... - ymateen - January 22, 2002 - 16:40 UTC
        • Yazir, you are correct on the exact meaning of "evolution" - alexander - January 22, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
          • Actually, I am not sure about that - ymateen - January 23, 2002 - 07:23 UTC
    • Harvey, I am simply sick and tied correct your mistakes. - alexander - January 22, 2002 - 14:53 UTC
      • Well, I hope that isn't true - harvey1 - January 22, 2002 - 15:29 UTC
• I do want but can't.... - ymateen - January 22, 2002 - 16:16 UTC
  • The floodgates - harvey1 - January 22, 2002 - 16:47 UTC
    • Difference between science and theology. - alexander - January 22, 2002 - 23:07 UTC
      • We should try to advance our discussions - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:14 UTC
      • Science ignores certain facts - yanniru - January 23, 2002 - 15:21 UTC
• Black and White - xion03 - January 23, 2002 - 00:19 UTC
  • The more science, the less gods. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 06:30 UTC
    • It's a Gaussian curve - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 13:20 UTC
      • Correction - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 13:21 UTC
        • A dangerous step - ymateen - January 24, 2002 - 17:00 UTC
          • The art of subjectivity - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 19:15 UTC
            • Harv's post translated to English - aurino - January 24, 2002 - 20:03 UTC
              • Humor or serious? - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 20:12 UTC
            • Harvey, define nature, please. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 20:59 UTC
              • That's not what I'm saying - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 21:23 UTC
                • Alex, read the writing on the wall - aurino - January 24, 2002 - 21:33 UTC
                  • Prove? - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 21:41 UTC
                    • We must infer??? - doctordick - January 25, 2002 - 14:03 UTC
                      • We must define??? - aurino - January 25, 2002 - 14:56 UTC
                      • That's right - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 15:00 UTC
                • Is anything wrong with Newton's laws? - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 23:24 UTC
                  • Doesn't work in QM - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 01:54 UTC
                    • Correction. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 00:26 UTC
                  • Some issues regarding the correction - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:03 UTC
                    • Correction - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:04 UTC
            • Correction: H-D method not H-T method (nt) - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 15:40 UTC
      • Harvey, you mention just people's opinion. No F(ACTS) of gods. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 19:02 UTC
        • Holy principle - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 19:50 UTC
          • If to look for gods, more logical would be to say math=god(s). - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 20:42 UTC
            • But, I'm talking about a higher principle - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 20:50 UTC
              • Harvey, again, unification is the result of math. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 21:03 UTC
                • You named it holy! - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 21:34 UTC
                  • Yes, if you mean "mathematical" by holy, I agree. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 22:06 UTC
                    • It is higher than mathematical - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 22:26 UTC
                      • Math (logic) starts exactly when anything comes to existence. - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 00:18 UTC
                        • Cart before the horse - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 01:27 UTC
                          • Incorrect.First I label"something" and then call it "existing" - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 04:21 UTC
                        • That's still cart before the horse - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 15:07 UTC
                          • "Something" is not a principle. - alexander - January 26, 2002 - 00:26 UTC
                        • That would defeat the purpose - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 00:55 UTC
                          • Harvey, word "before" has no meaning here. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 00:46 UTC
                        • That's not what I meant by the term 'before' - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:50 UTC
                          • Finally you start understanding. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 17:22 UTC
                        • Hey, wait a second... - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 17:49 UTC
• Harv, you speak with loaded assertions. - luis_hamburgh - January 24, 2002 - 00:38 UTC
  • I only the load them when I'm trying to hit something - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 04:46 UTC
    • Science ≠ Ontology - luis_hamburgh - January 25, 2002 - 23:58 UTC
      • Cool title - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 01:20 UTC
        • No switching here. Unnecessary ontology is absurd. - luis_hamburgh - January 28, 2002 - 01:11 UTC
      • Cool title - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 01:22 UTC
        • Read this one! (nt) - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 01:22 UTC
        • I do that too (mess up HTML). (n/t) - luis_hamburgh - January 28, 2002 - 01:15 UTC