Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
We Should Try To Advance Our Discussions

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on January 23, 2002 00:14:06 UTC

Alex,

We can round and round all day, so our only hope is to advance our dialogue. To do that we need to provide more references in support of our position.

What references can you cite that state that "[p]hilosophy uses observable facts too, but due to lack of use of advanced logic (=math) it is way more subjective than science when it comes to complex systems or complex issues"? In other words, how do you support the contention that logic used in philosophy (which includes math by the way) is less accurate than scientific logic (e.g., math)?

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins