Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: My Theory Says... Continued More

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Dale Lake on April 7, 2000 14:47:54 UTC

So...

With the original void, which has no energy
density, thus no relativity, we see an inertial
state which could spit out matter and anti-matter
pairs which by quantum physics alone would have
a possibility of surviving in it`s own creating
spacetime, but the probability would be almost
non-existant, let alone the chance that
more particle/anti-particle pairs could survive long enough to create the stable base for life
which we have today.
So we run into the god factor. Since the system we talk about is a void with only fleeting glimpses of space time while the fluctuating mass
exists, and since this theory moves from the void
to the fundamental tone, still a closed system
which can`t be proven according to Godel`s theorem,
God need be discussed, admitting the impossibility
of proof. To understand the creation of the universe,
a leap of faith is required: the void was and is concious, but without relativity could not know itself
except as a void. So it willed itself into the naturally
unfolding, pattern, which of course would require
itself as the holographic reference: GOD.

First of all, the fundamental tone and it`s overtones
would dicipate into infinity and not provide
the stable base required for creation. So we need
the dance. Limiting the harmonic series to {1,2,3,4}
and allowing for an orderly pattern which would establish
the beginning of spacetime (measured as the inverse
square law based on pi r squared), then we can apply quantum rules to our number set n={1,2,3,4}.
Specifically, 2 n squared, transfprming possibility into probability: {1,2,3,4} becomes
{2,8,18,32}, being the maximum probability of electrons in any atomic orbital.
Review: zero into dance into probability allowing the elements. Holographic universe, life, us, me writing this now.












Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins