RE: To Many Assumptions - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

RE: To Many Assumptions

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Phil.O.Sofir on April 8, 2000 15:56:34 UTC

There seems to be a reasoning behind your theory, although they are based upon assumptions which are very speculative. The first and most important is that at one point in the present the universe was a complete void. Also there is the assumption that the universe is a closed system and that it is warped due to this enclosure.
Then there is the numrical basis of point zero which is based upon the time or moment before the "void" "created" a non-void, there is really no such thing as zero, it is a concept which allows the rest of mathmatical priniples to be based upon, in reality there is no point or existance of it, it is only a reference for lack of our knowledge about so many needed references such as what space/time is. As far as the use of our solar system as a harmonic synthesis, it is only one system in many we are aware of, and takes its points on objects of ones choice rather than what is really involved in the mechanics of our solar system, comets and extra terrestial asteroids are a good example, unless they are accounted for like the sudden and unexpected shift in tempo, harmony, and degree such as in Hyden`s surprize :)

Follow Ups:

RE: RE: to many assumptions - from assuption arise patterns - April 9, 2000 - 03:44 UTC
- Nothingness cannot be measured, even with the label of zero - Phil.O.Sofir - April 9, 2000 - 08:09 UTC
  - RE: Nothingness cannot be measured, even with the label of zero - Dale Lake - April 9, 2000 - 15:27 UTC
    - RE: RE: Nothingness cannot be measured, even with the label of zero - Phil.O.sofir - April 10, 2000 - 03:41 UTC
      - RE: RE: RE: Nothingness cannot be measured, even with the label of zero - Infinidi - April 12, 2000 - 01:49 UTC
        
        Thus time itself had a beginning - the beginning of time - April 12, 2000 - 12:26 UTC
        
        RE: Thus time itself had a beginning - Phil.O.Sofir - April 13, 2000 - 02:17 UTC
        
        There is no arguement against the true source of creation - Bluxzter - April 20, 2000 - 04:02 UTC
        
        RE: source of creation - Jonny B says Bluxter is a fool - April 20, 2000 - 07:26 UTC
        
        RE: RE: source of creation - Jonny B - April 20, 2000 - 07:29 UTC
        
        RE: RE: RE: source of creation - jb - April 20, 2000 - 07:31 UTC
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: source of creation - jb - April 20, 2000 - 07:34 UTC
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: source of creation - jb - April 20, 2000 - 07:36 UTC
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: source of creation - jb - April 20, 2000 - 07:38 UTC
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: source of creation - jb - April 20, 2000 - 07:39 UTC
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: Nothingness cannot be measured, even with the label of zero - Phi.O.Sofir - April 13, 2000 - 02:05 UTC
- RE: RE: RE: to many assumptions - Phil.O.Sofir - April 9, 2000 - 08:18 UTC
- RE: RE: RE: to many assumptions - Phil.O.Sofir - April 9, 2000 - 08:19 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins