Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Continued More Again

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Dale Lake on April 7, 2000 17:32:29 UTC

And according to my theory
now we have a cosmological constant
and holography and harmonics, synthesized into
the unified field and it`s many diversities.

Let`s look at the number sets:
(0)
(1,2,3,4)
(2,8,18,32)
(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8...) (notice atomic number sequence)

Which now requires us to see the one other rule
of harmonics besides the single point theorem:

The Octave Law:
any doubling of these numbers creates the next
octave note of the number doubled...
1 and 2 and 4 and 8 and 16 and 32...
are all Doe, as in Do, Re, Mi...

This implies all odd numbers,
never having been doubled
are new tones,
and each of their doubles are their octave partners.

Three is Sol,
5 is Mee,
7 is Ah,
9 is Rae
11 is Fu,
13 is Mu,
15 is Tee.

Using the octave doubling rule
we find the harmonic tones
between Does at 8 and 16:
(8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) or
Doe Rae Mee Fu Sol Mu Ah Tee Doe.

These notes are not chromatic,
these tones are harmonic
by natural law.

Beteen Doe at 4 and Doe at 8
we find Doe Mee Sol Ah Doe.
This is called the chord of life
and is a wonderful music scale,
and being one of the harmonic
number sets
is natural.
Chromatics are unnatural.

Of course as we take harmonics into such fields as biology
we soon see the insanity of imposing chromatic vibrations
on the harmonic cellular level.
Ugly cancerous results.

Future of this theory?...
Surgeon general warnings on grocery stores:
"Warning, the chromatic backgound music
in this store, could be hazardous
to your health."

Of course if you believe me you`ll have problems
with such experts as Steven Weinberg
(p.86, TIME, April 10,2000):
"...a final theory is not going to help us cure cancer or understand consciousness...
The discovery of a final theory could have a cultural influence as well...
Learning how the universe is governed
by the impersonal principles..."

Even the Nobel laureate imposes
limits on what he doesn`t know.

Strange world, Yes?








Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins