Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Who Are You?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam Patterson on September 30, 2002 18:05:55 UTC

You: "There are so many things wrong with your
argument that it's almost cruel of you to
keep badgering us with it.

1) The cars do have common ancestors. The genetic information of cars is not carried via
sexual reproduction, but is the basis of each generation of design. So your point proves

2) We KNOW that sexual reproduction in animals
DOES create new combinations of DNA which gradually can change the average form of any genetic line. Mutations alone are not the only cause of genetic change!

At this point, it should be clear that
no Creationist should have ANY worldly authority over folks who are more honest and more evolved."

Point 1. So you are saying a Porsche and a beetle have a common ancestor, and it 'evolved' through car design to their models? Uh-huh. What would this original design be?

Point 2. Ok, but does it add new genetic information? If not, this is nothing. If so, tell me about it. Sounds interesting.

I'm not even sure what your last sentence means. I'll just assume it is a poorly worded insult.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins