By supporting information, we assume you mean hot linto a creationist page.

You waltz into this forum (or is it a dance from another continent?) purporting to be around 18 years old, and argue that all mainstream science is fundamentally wrong in their own subject areas, and that you are right.. and you post links to someone else's web pages as your evidence.
In our discussion, you show boldness but don't show
much ability to learn or concede any point.
If you are truly a harbinger of how knowledge will
be "done" in future, it's a kids' world coming...and, the way you are going, you will live in a future
"splendor" of an over-populated, ignorant, superstitious world -- that you helped create by
tying up conversations with filibusters about nonsense you and your (friends?) apparently don't, and maybe can't, comprehend.

I have posted
many worthwhile answers to your questions ...
and you have, it seems by your responses or
non-responses, turned a blind eye to them.
My posts were not my personal pet peeves, but
good answers for which, to convey them clearly, I paid a lifetime of dues by
studying both science and communications,
both in college and by independent reading,
and by the practice of voluminous writing
and scribbling. By contrast with you, I have a strong academic record,
including the equivalent of more than 100
quarter hours in math and science.
I have worked in communications for a high-tech
corporation and created a web site for a science
education company. On the religious side,
I have attended religious services in more than
a dozen faiths. I have also written a science fiction novel.
In other words, if the question is whether You or I should be the person grading your part in our discussion, the answer is I. If the question is whether either of us can suggest the devil is at work, I believe either of us can. But since you
seem to have so little knowledge, there is no need, point or reason to explain to you how the devil is at work in your posts.
I will not try to explain to you at this time
why I have made that assertion. There is no
ethical need for me to do so. Your implied demand that I do so is another example of how
you misunderstand meaning of communication.