http://www.astronomy.net/forums/userinfo/emperor__alikar/
353 is how many posts you have sent to the forum.
If I have only 'insulted' you (mildly, I'm sure) 13 times, then I have been far too mild.
Your posts, while showing aptitude for knowledge at times, generally are unmitigated garbage as knowledge and you are
not improving. You do not answer the main questions in a dialogue head-on, but employ debating ploys a.k.a. the lying arts most times. There is no point in pretending you seek the truth when you are not. If I can see you are dishonest, surely the Creator knows your heart also.

It's better to be honest with you than insult you with lukewarm answers to your lukewarm questions, rhetoric, and citations.
- M

• Ouch! - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
  • This tells an interesting story with questions - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:39 UTC
  • "when" diversity increases in the fossil record (nt) - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:40 UTC
  • Good question! - quiet - October 3, 2002 - 02:32 UTC
    • whoa! - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 18:24 UTC
      • The reason for multiple screen names - harvey1 - October 4, 2002 - 19:51 UTC
        • oooh, I get it! - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 21:59 UTC
          • If you believe Harv on that, you are not doing science - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 22:39 UTC
            • That's correct - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:59 UTC
              • Hi Harv, Chris, et al - quiet - October 5, 2002 - 02:41 UTC
                • Finally - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 13:14 UTC
                  • That "finally" remark is quite an innuendo - quiet - October 6, 2002 - 01:52 UTC
                    • Is that how you really feel? (nt) - harvey1 - October 6, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
                      • What do you really mean by that? (nt) - carefuluniverse - October 7, 2002 - 03:32 UTC
          • I only go by one screen name (nt) - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:59 UTC
        • Where did everyone go? - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 22:08 UTC
          • On that note... - kc2gwx - October 5, 2002 - 04:18 UTC
            • Sorry - fasteddy - October 6, 2002 - 03:06 UTC
        • Not so...and not scientific either...That's a crock, Harv - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 22:38 UTC
          • Would you tell me? - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 23:18 UTC
          • I wasn't speaking for you - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:54 UTC
            • If you ask WHY, I will tell you..at greater length than needed? - quiet - October 5, 2002 - 02:55 UTC
              • Ethics - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 13:17 UTC
  • Good question! We could use Scriptures with dinosaurs accounted - quiet - October 3, 2002 - 02:34 UTC
• You forgot the 483... - richard - October 3, 2002 - 18:43 UTC
  • I don't even know why I argue.... - kc2gwx - October 4, 2002 - 15:19 UTC
• 0: the number of acutal points that you have made against mine. - emperor__alikar - October 4, 2002 - 03:03 UTC
  • I do tend to write in waves...which are made of points - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 17:56 UTC
    • har har (nt) - emperor__alikar - October 6, 2002 - 02:06 UTC