Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I'm Not Following You, I Must Have Missed A Dance Step

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on September 13, 2001 03:35:45 UTC

Hey Luis,

>>>H: "As for you contention that set theory is dependent upon math in terms of using mathematical deductive principles, proofs, etc, then of course! But, that seems to be a trivial concern. Why do you mention it if that is your concern?" L: This 'trivial' concern is at the root of my argument. You have espoused the empiricist position that maths is deductive. This is an admission that mathematics is contingent, and not innate.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins