Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Can Cars Run On This Kind Of Fuel?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on September 18, 2001 04:56:13 UTC

Yo Luis,

>>>Your brand of philosophy relies upon excessive conjecture, and deems any facet of its unprovable guesswork ‘metaphysics.’ This view of philosophy is peculiarly constricted, and I find it arrogant you should imply this unquestioning acceptance of untenable axioms is philosophy, and everything else is not!Russell was a skeptic through and through. He was an empiricist, and in fact exposed the (ZFC) set theory’s shortcomings (Russell’s Paradox). There is indeed a logical reason so many philosophers recoil at the very mention of his name.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins