Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Innie Or Outie?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on September 15, 2001 01:01:28 UTC

Harv,

My “case” has not changed since I created the source post for this thread. Perhaps another read through my original essay could have prevented you from defending issues I haven't disputed.

Particularly, my position is not one that denies "structural rules to the universe as a result of mathematical order." To suggest that my descriptive-mathematics position disputes this order would be duplicitous, except in the case where I have failed to sufficiently construe my position, or you have not grasped my argument.

I do not think you are duplicitous.

There are only so many ways I can establish my position, and I feel I have exhausted my supply of ‘angles,’ to include a lengthy quote from Stephen Hawking.

>>>" I don't see your point."

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins