There is no theory supported by all observations. This includes Newton's, Einatein's as well as all quantum theories. You name a theory and I can give you an observation that it does not predict.

So please respond with what you think the natural laws are and by your own definition of natural law I will give your observations they do not predict. So by your definition there are no natural laws.

• Scientific Law, Theory - johnpowell - April 3, 2001 - 21:12 UTC
  • Theories, laws and hypothesis. - alexander - April 4, 2001 - 20:18 UTC
    • Can there be competing theories, both verified? - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 22:44 UTC
      • EPR paradox - yanniru - April 5, 2001 - 16:47 UTC
        • False Laws of Nature? - doctordick - April 5, 2001 - 17:38 UTC
        • A scientific law may be valid in a large regime, but not all - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 21:50 UTC
        • EPR = Einstein, Padolsky, Rosen? - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 22:04 UTC
      • I'm right you are wrong! - doctordick - April 5, 2001 - 17:34 UTC
        • I'll need to go back to your page - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 20:56 UTC
        • Richard, you are wrong - there are PLENTY of correct theories. - alexander - April 6, 2001 - 18:52 UTC
  • are you intersested - newguy - August 28, 2001 - 00:28 UTC
• Scientific fact, speculation, hypothesis, etc. - johnpowell - April 3, 2001 - 21:33 UTC
  • Agreed - yanniru - April 4, 2001 - 11:59 UTC
    • Vague replies cause confusion. - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
  • macro vs micro - isaiaha41 - April 4, 2001 - 15:17 UTC
    • Biblical "kinds" undefined. - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 17:05 UTC
    • What do you have to replace science? - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 17:09 UTC
      • That is not the issue - isaiaha41 - April 4, 2001 - 17:51 UTC
        • What can replace natural science? - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 22:32 UTC
          • Natural Science! - doctordick - April 5, 2001 - 15:51 UTC
            • F=ma is the DEFINITION of force. - alexander - April 5, 2001 - 17:12 UTC
            • Weight and mass - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 20:38 UTC
              • Weight as Force - doctordick - April 6, 2001 - 13:58 UTC
                • "Again" says the little one. - johnpowell - April 6, 2001 - 16:45 UTC
                  • No real argument here! - doctordick - April 7, 2001 - 00:52 UTC
    • There is no such thing as "sudden origin of specie" - alexander - April 4, 2001 - 19:05 UTC
      • Adult at 18, 21 or 13? - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 22:24 UTC
        • Is this right? - doctordick - April 5, 2001 - 14:52 UTC
          • Exactly. Clear definitions are a must in discussions. - alexander - April 5, 2001 - 15:47 UTC
          • The mind is willing but other concerns make their demands - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 18:49 UTC
        • Or Wrong! - doctordick - April 5, 2001 - 14:54 UTC
      • says who? - isaiaha41 - April 5, 2001 - 17:42 UTC
        • Why then your DNA is 98.5% chimp's DNA? - alexander - April 5, 2001 - 22:23 UTC
        • Thank God, but don't blame Him - johnpowell - April 6, 2001 - 16:38 UTC
• Plenty of theories around supported by all observations. - alexander - April 4, 2001 - 18:56 UTC