Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Richard, You Are Wrong - There Are PLENTY Of Correct Theories.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on April 6, 2001 18:52:10 UTC

For example, flat Earth theory (flatness of small ereas on any surface). What is wrong with this theory? Very accurate (all farmers, realtos, designers, students, civil engineers, laymen, construction workers, etc. use it on DAYLY BASIS having NO PROBLEMs - there are no FAULTS in it. Correct, true and accurate.

So does QM, GR, Newtonian gravitation, Newtonian motion, Galilean transformation, Lorentz transformation, evoution, Big Bang, inflation and thousand other theories. They are very accurate and proven by ALL observations.

So, you are incorrect, there are plenty of correct theories around.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins