I don't want to stifle all the interesting dialogue going on, but I was still hoping for some help with my question about "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Does anyone have anything they want to say about that?

• Re: Re: Do Extraordinary Claims Really Require Extraordinary Evidence - yanniru - March 9, 2001 - 12:35 UTC
  • If strong ESP yes then most Science no. - johnpowell - March 9, 2001 - 17:36 UTC
    • Re: If strong ESP yes then most Science no. - yanniru - March 9, 2001 - 19:24 UTC
      • Is "Remote Sensing" a kind of ESP? - johnpowell - March 13, 2001 - 20:02 UTC
        • IT has been detected - yanniru - March 13, 2001 - 23:35 UTC
          • I'm waiting for reliable supporting experiments. - johnpowell - March 19, 2001 - 20:18 UTC
            • Randi - yanniru - March 19, 2001 - 22:09 UTC
              • Randi is well-qualified to catch deception - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 02:30 UTC
  • Repeated extraordinary evidence becomes ordinary? - johnpowell - March 9, 2001 - 17:47 UTC
    • Re: Repeated extraordinary evidence becomes ordinary? - yanniru - March 9, 2001 - 19:29 UTC
      • Millions of Nobel Prize losers. - alexander - March 12, 2001 - 15:42 UTC
        • Show me the evidence - yanniru - March 13, 2001 - 13:25 UTC
          • Actually not millions but billions. Sorry. - alexander - March 13, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
            • Know nothing? - yanniru - March 13, 2001 - 23:25 UTC
              • Did anything supernatural thing happen to you? - johnpowell - March 19, 2001 - 20:25 UTC
                • Yes - yanniru - March 19, 2001 - 22:05 UTC
                  • Meaning of science? - alexander - March 20, 2001 - 00:27 UTC
                    • No meaning at all. - yanniru - March 20, 2001 - 13:43 UTC
                      • Religion knows much less than science does - johnpowell - April 6, 2001 - 20:00 UTC
                  • Science is superior to religion, organized or othewise - johnpowell - April 6, 2001 - 19:57 UTC
              • Get data, print paper and get Nobel Prize. - alexander - March 20, 2001 - 00:29 UTC
                • No Nobel Prize for Metaphysics - yanniru - March 20, 2001 - 13:46 UTC
                  • Not necessarily. - alexander - March 21, 2001 - 20:51 UTC
                    • But no one will fund them - yanniru - March 22, 2001 - 13:43 UTC
                      • Nonreproducible results? - alexander - March 22, 2001 - 16:39 UTC
                        • Not my results - yanniru - March 22, 2001 - 23:27 UTC
                          • No one can stop science. - alexander - March 23, 2001 - 00:24 UTC
                            • SRI was stopped - yanniru - March 23, 2001 - 13:25 UTC
                              • But they can not stop human ego. - alexander - March 23, 2001 - 20:09 UTC
                          • Scientists must protect science from the superstitious - johnpowell - March 30, 2001 - 23:30 UTC
                            • What about entanglement - yanniru - March 31, 2001 - 01:57 UTC
        • A few above average psychic experiments are expected by chance - johnpowell - March 13, 2001 - 19:04 UTC