Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Re: Do Extraordinary Claims Really Require Extraordinary Evidence

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on March 9, 2001 12:35:29 UTC

OK. I think the opposite is true. In science, extraordinary claims have always been made on very limited evidence. The latest claim of supersymmetry, or rather evidence for supersymmetry, is based on very limited evidence of the Muon. In fact, most of the time, that is most of the data, shows no evidence.

So perhaps you could say in this sense that the limited muon data showing supersymmetry- well actually it in itself does not show supersymmetry, it's just a possible explanation- is extraordinary in the sense that it is not ordinarily seen. It happens infrequently.

So in this definition of extraordinary, that something is happening infrequently under the same conditions, then extraordinary claims come from extraordinary data. Science has always worked that way. Take entanglement. Certainly an extraordinary claim of entanglement, that came from one experiment- Aspect's- that now has been repeated over and over.

So the extraordinary data or experiment becomes ordinary if allowed to be repeated. But if extraordinary research is not allowed to be repeated, which is the case, then the data remains extraordinary and the normal process in science of making things ordinary is frustrated.

Would you like to talk about that. Or do you think that extraordinary experiments must be flawed and need not be repeated, as you have stated in previous posts. If so, then in my mind you are not a true scientist. Perhaps we could say that you are an ordinary scientist, not an extraordinary one.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins