I Set No Limits - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Set No Limits

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on July 3, 2003 21:02:20 UTC

Aurino,

Transportation is perhaps the slowest moving technology in that a century has passed and we are still using the carbon combustion engine. However this lack of progress in one century is by no means an indicator of future progress. For one thing, the carbon combustion and rocket propulsion technologies are based on 19th and early 20th century science, while technologies of the future will be based on quantum technologies using quantum computers having far more simulation and creative abilities than existing technologies. In short, the speed of technology development is accelerating and our physics has advanced much further since the 19th century. That's not to say a new propulsion system is just around the corner, but 'T3' (i.e., advanced computer systems using quantum computing and nanotechnologies) might help us get their faster. Speculation of limitations is just as shortsighted as speculation of successes. We just don't know.

Follow Ups:

this is interesting enough to have its own forum! - whomi - July 4, 2003 - 02:15 UTC
- It's not a space exploration issue - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 13:46 UTC
  - Well, can't it be bo th? - whomi - July 4, 2003 - 19:21 UTC
You do not _acknowledge_ limits - setting them is not up to you - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 12:50 UTC
- Who is the limits up to then? - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 13:42 UTC
  - Logic? Nature? God? Definitely not us - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 14:24 UTC
    - Aurino, can I have a few million dollars? - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 14:36 UTC
      - Funny that you mentioned money - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 14:51 UTC
        
        Maybe so - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 15:05 UTC
        
        Nonsense! - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 15:37 UTC
        
        Not so - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 15:50 UTC
        
        So! - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 15:56 UTC
        
        And so... - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 17:18 UTC
        
        You may be in good company, but my company is even better - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 17:49 UTC
        
        But, my scientists can beat up your scientists - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 17:52 UTC
        
        I have Einstein on my side... - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 17:59 UTC
        
        This just occurred to me - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 18:03 UTC
        
        No - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 18:57 UTC
        
        Reminds me of when Woody Allen brought in Marshall McCluhan - whomi - July 4, 2003 - 19:23 UTC
        
        The Warp Drive metric... - bruce - July 4, 2003 - 20:27 UTC
        
        Some papers on the subject.. - bruce - July 4, 2003 - 20:36 UTC
        
        I have found the answer to the problem - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 21:05 UTC
        
        Ah, and if they are light years away... - lysithea - July 4, 2003 - 23:43 UTC
        
        Right on... - bruce - July 5, 2003 - 20:46 UTC
        
        It's cool stuff - harvey1 - July 6, 2003 - 01:48 UTC
        
        Really? - lysithea - July 6, 2003 - 20:20 UTC
        
        Good luck at getting a job at NASA. - bruce - July 7, 2003 - 01:40 UTC
        
        Theoretical Physicist. - lysithea - July 7, 2003 - 02:00 UTC
        
        Do you believe it? What license does it give? - carefuluniverse - July 7, 2003 - 04:44 UTC
        
        Bruce is vermin; exterminate him immediately - carefuluniverse - July 7, 2003 - 04:25 UTC
        
        and here's why I wrote that (though I am actually pretty nice) - carefuluniverse - July 12, 2003 - 21:22 UTC
        
        Out of fairness - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 17:01 UTC
        
        Also out of fairness - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 17:15 UTC
        
        Since when you became a crank? - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 17:39 UTC
        
        Again, not proved wrong - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 17:41 UTC
        
        And what exactly would those be? - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 17:51 UTC
        
        Apples and oranges... - smartguy - July 4, 2003 - 18:37 UTC
        
        One point of correction - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 18:51 UTC
        
        Seeing through Harv's BS - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 19:22 UTC
        
        BS? - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 20:28 UTC
        
        Alrighty Then... - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 18:47 UTC
        
        As I expected, you dodged the issue - aurino_ - July 4, 2003 - 19:15 UTC
        
        Can't turn it around - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 20:21 UTC
        
        Correction - harvey1 - July 4, 2003 - 20:30 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins