Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Apples And Oranges...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mark on July 4, 2003 18:37:50 UTC

One is reffering to accelerating a spacecraft up to and exceeding light (Aurino), which he correctly stated is impossible. Mass goes to infinite as v -> c, requiring an infinite impulse to reach c (clearly absurd). There's also a bunch of other absurdities and contradictions, but that one in itself is enough to throw the whole idea out the window.

The other (Harv) is also correct in that there is a serious scientific inquiry into whether other means (stable wormholes, quantum teleportation, connecting points "A" & "B" through some sort of gravitational manipulation of spacetime (basically another way of saying 'wormhole') and then "jumping the gap" (now a small gap rather than light years), etc.).

Both of you are miscommunicating in which case you will debate until you turn blue; and you're both correct.

...Happens all the time when two people KNOW they're correct, and won't budge.

Aurino: Orthodox Physics

Harv: Exotic Alternative Means

Aurino: Einstein, Minkowski...

Harv: Hawking, Wheeler...

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins