But it is the entire sum that you use in your derivation

***Now, having proved that, let us open up F to any set of arguments. And let us also open
up psi to any function. Now F*psi is no longer zero!

However, the constraint F*psi=0 is the one I want to satisfy. Now notice that F is a
massive sum! The rule F*psi = zero is not a rule on each term, it is a rule on the sum!
The rule may be satisfied without requiring any given term to be zero! ***

However, I am not terribly concerned with how you actually derived your result because I can get the nsame result without using the delta function.

I am puzzled however that you claim that Schroedinger's equation is a constant energy approximation. If so, how do you explain the energy levels that are derived using it, such as for the Hydrogen atom.

If you knew physics you would know that Harvard has been at the forefront of the quest to unify physics. So I conclude that you just do not know.

I also must note your characteristic of attacking the individual when you have difficutly defending your work. However, I welcome this characterictic when directed at me. You and Mike have been personality education, my personality.

• Yanniru: a question - dolphin - May 11, 2002 - 22:59 UTC
  • Yanniru, further on the above - dolphin - May 12, 2002 - 00:49 UTC
    • And note Aurino's comment - dolphin - May 12, 2002 - 01:19 UTC
      • Responding to Aurino - yanniru - May 12, 2002 - 18:44 UTC
• ????? - doctordick - May 13, 2002 - 01:05 UTC
  • I agree with John Anderson and Eric Preby - bruce - May 13, 2002 - 05:37 UTC
    • Too bad they didn't give a thorough response - harvey1 - May 13, 2002 - 14:26 UTC
      • Too bad, indeed - pmartin - May 13, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
        • Science has already solved Dick's problem - yanniru - May 13, 2002 - 15:56 UTC
          • It could be - pmartin - May 13, 2002 - 16:17 UTC
            • It's all math - yanniru - May 13, 2002 - 22:58 UTC
              • "Our" longest sustained topic ever here thus settled? - occupant - May 14, 2002 - 07:27 UTC
              • I think your insight is as keen as your wit, Mike (nt) - pmartin - May 15, 2002 - 23:03 UTC
                • Although I'm residential, I'll pass along your remarks to Mike - occupant - May 15, 2002 - 23:26 UTC
        • Pythagorean nonsense - harvey1 - May 13, 2002 - 16:52 UTC
          • some kind of nonsense, for sure - occupant - May 14, 2002 - 07:11 UTC
      • A wave equation - yanniru - May 13, 2002 - 15:49 UTC
        • I need to review this - harvey1 - May 13, 2002 - 19:10 UTC
          • I am pleased that Dick sticks to his guns - yanniru - May 14, 2002 - 21:20 UTC
            • you were quite unsuccessful refuting MY points - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 05:18 UTC
      • 'Political' science....I don't think Dr. Dick seeks "adherents" - occupant - May 13, 2002 - 16:30 UTC
        • It's not "it's flinger" of course; it's "its flinger." - occupant - May 14, 2002 - 04:55 UTC
      • Harv - bruce - May 14, 2002 - 14:50 UTC
        • I agree the response was warranted - harvey1 - May 14, 2002 - 15:11 UTC
      • Harv - bruce - May 14, 2002 - 14:52 UTC
        • ridiculous comments do not augment science writing - occupant - May 14, 2002 - 15:48 UTC
          • They are much easier... - bruce - May 15, 2002 - 14:23 UTC
            • sly, clever - something - May 15, 2002 - 15:38 UTC
              • I agree with.. - bruce - May 16, 2002 - 03:31 UTC
                • So a metaphor is not ridiculous even if far from exact? - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 05:51 UTC
                  • I agree with Patrick and Bilge... - bruce - May 16, 2002 - 20:29 UTC
                    • thanks, you took the easier questions and left the others to - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 21:30 UTC
                      • Not sure what you are getting at... - bruce - May 16, 2002 - 23:48 UTC
                        • nibbling around at the topics - occupant - May 17, 2002 - 04:14 UTC
                          • Tell me what you think wrt universal time... - bruce - May 17, 2002 - 04:49 UTC
                            • Universal may be like relative time but context frame bigger - spazcon - May 17, 2002 - 19:11 UTC
                            • Were you going to reply this year? - carefuluniverse - June 6, 2002 - 16:21 UTC
                    • I agree with myself - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 23:44 UTC
  • Equation 5.3 - yanniru - May 13, 2002 - 14:25 UTC
    • A note on rigor - pmartin - May 13, 2002 - 16:04 UTC
      • Isomorphisms - yanniru - May 13, 2002 - 23:05 UTC