so you understood and endorsed the
"crock of Language Removed" metaphor when you invoked it,
but when I used "look in the mirror" as a metaphor
you slyly, cleverly pointed out there is also
an ACTUAL description of the process...looking
right at it...maybe you see what I mean about your other posts.
I like the fact you spelled out some relativity.
It seems you use a double standard for whether
informal terms like terming someone's thoughts a "crock of Language Removed" are actual
science or ridiculous statement.
If what Dr. Dick said is a crock of Language Removed, ought we mention almost every post in the past two weeks about evolution has some serious technical errors...and kindly tell the posters their work is a "crock of Language Removed." Or do you reserve this for
folks like Dr. Dick?
Okay, unlike everyone else, I'm probably
making an annoyance.

Thanks for replying, Bruce....or was that a reply?

• I agree with.. - bruce - May 16, 2002 - 03:31 UTC
  • So a metaphor is not ridiculous even if far from exact? - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 05:51 UTC
    • I agree with Patrick and Bilge... - bruce - May 16, 2002 - 20:29 UTC
      • thanks, you took the easier questions and left the others to - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 21:30 UTC
        • Not sure what you are getting at... - bruce - May 16, 2002 - 23:48 UTC
          • nibbling around at the topics - occupant - May 17, 2002 - 04:14 UTC
            • Tell me what you think wrt universal time... - bruce - May 17, 2002 - 04:49 UTC
              • Universal may be like relative time but context frame bigger - spazcon - May 17, 2002 - 19:11 UTC
              • Were you going to reply this year? - carefuluniverse - June 6, 2002 - 16:21 UTC
      • I agree with myself - occupant - May 16, 2002 - 23:44 UTC