Do you mean to say the "scientific method" of arriving at conclusions which can only then be reffered to as 'scientific' is not the only method that can be employed in science?
Do you also think that philosophy of science itself is a part of science rather than a subdivision of philosophy ( a non-scientific thing despite that it "begets" science)?

• Their words answer you so well - carefuluniverse - November 26, 2001 - 06:30 UTC
  • Scientific method is observing fact and explaining it logically. - alexander - November 26, 2001 - 22:03 UTC
    • Chances!!!! - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:24 UTC
      • "to be bold that much.... scientifically?" (nt) - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:43 UTC
      • More than enough. - alexander - November 27, 2001 - 20:45 UTC
        • Those old-fashioned 'gods' are not the only option - dolphin - November 28, 2001 - 06:41 UTC
        • God, philosophy and Science - ymateen - November 28, 2001 - 16:10 UTC
          • Science had already proven nonexistence of god. - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:30 UTC
            • Alex: Stephen Hawking found God but didn't recognise Him - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:25 UTC
              • Hawkins and many Nobelists belive in god. They are just wrong. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:11 UTC
                • They also believed in ether(nt) - yanniru - November 29, 2001 - 15:14 UTC
                  • There also was this guy who thought... - smartguy - November 29, 2001 - 15:56 UTC
                    • fortunately, science does not deal with beliefs, but with facts. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 22:48 UTC
                      • You are the second biggest "arguer from authority" on this list - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
                        • I just state the fact(hat schience deals with facts,not belifs) - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 04:06 UTC
                          • Alex: do you believe this to be a fact? - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:23 UTC
                            • Regardless my belief, science deals with FACTS. - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 20:13 UTC
                • Hawking defines God as "Universal Order" - sound familiar? (nt) - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:42 UTC
                  • Just another name of math (logic). - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:23 UTC
                    • But Hawking recognizes the need for higher dimensions (nt) - luis_hamburgh - December 1, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
            • Alex: the subject is: EXISTENCE IS WHO IS. - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:29 UTC
              • Alan, you said nonsence statements (beings, trios, etc). - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:02 UTC
                • I am talking about a certain claim - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:27 UTC
            • It's logically impossible to prove inexistence of God (nt - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
              • No, vice versa: logically god simply does NOT exist. - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
                • You cannot change logic, only your image of stubbornness. - luis_hamburgh - December 7, 2001 - 03:00 UTC
      • Shall I believe the technologist or the theorist? - carefuluniverse - November 28, 2001 - 18:25 UTC
        • Still looking for "beings" around? - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:32 UTC
          • Hope you meant that in a nice way - carefuluniverse - November 29, 2001 - 05:05 UTC
    • Alexander is teasing. Real math proves limits of mechanics - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 19:02 UTC
      • Michael, do you want to say something or what? - alexander - December 1, 2001 - 01:38 UTC