(And logic in advanced form is called math).

So, if you can observe and explain gods - they will become existing phenomena. If something is unobservable or logically (mathematically) unexplainable - chances are that it simply does not exist.

• Chances!!!! - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:24 UTC
  • "to be bold that much.... scientifically?" (nt) - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:43 UTC
  • More than enough. - alexander - November 27, 2001 - 20:45 UTC
    • Those old-fashioned 'gods' are not the only option - dolphin - November 28, 2001 - 06:41 UTC
    • God, philosophy and Science - ymateen - November 28, 2001 - 16:10 UTC
      • Science had already proven nonexistence of god. - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:30 UTC
        • Alex: Stephen Hawking found God but didn't recognise Him - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:25 UTC
          • Hawkins and many Nobelists belive in god. They are just wrong. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:11 UTC
            • They also believed in ether(nt) - yanniru - November 29, 2001 - 15:14 UTC
              • There also was this guy who thought... - smartguy - November 29, 2001 - 15:56 UTC
                • fortunately, science does not deal with beliefs, but with facts. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 22:48 UTC
                  • You are the second biggest "arguer from authority" on this list - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
                    • I just state the fact(hat schience deals with facts,not belifs) - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 04:06 UTC
                      • Alex: do you believe this to be a fact? - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:23 UTC
                        • Regardless my belief, science deals with FACTS. - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 20:13 UTC
            • Hawking defines God as "Universal Order" - sound familiar? (nt) - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:42 UTC
              • Just another name of math (logic). - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:23 UTC
                • But Hawking recognizes the need for higher dimensions (nt) - luis_hamburgh - December 1, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
        • Alex: the subject is: EXISTENCE IS WHO IS. - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:29 UTC
          • Alan, you said nonsence statements (beings, trios, etc). - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:02 UTC
            • I am talking about a certain claim - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:27 UTC
        • It's logically impossible to prove inexistence of God (nt - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
          • No, vice versa: logically god simply does NOT exist. - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
            • You cannot change logic, only your image of stubbornness. - luis_hamburgh - December 7, 2001 - 03:00 UTC
  • Shall I believe the technologist or the theorist? - carefuluniverse - November 28, 2001 - 18:25 UTC
    • Still looking for "beings" around? - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:32 UTC
      • Hope you meant that in a nice way - carefuluniverse - November 29, 2001 - 05:05 UTC
• Alexander is teasing. Real math proves limits of mechanics - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 19:02 UTC
  • Michael, do you want to say something or what? - alexander - December 1, 2001 - 01:38 UTC