SuperString Theory, granted is yet to prove anything. This is where I'm not smart enough to explain things indepth. I am trying to keep up with what is on the horizon. Any physisist would agree that S.S.T. is like getting a gift with part of the instruction pages missing, It's gonna take quite some time to figure this out. And yes I will conceed that General, Special and Quantum Theorys are going to have to do for now.
Edward Witten is currently considered a "Living Einstein" and wields a lot of influence in the string theory circles.
Their are so many more reputable names their too many to list here. Have you read up on any of the theorys. Do you have an open opinion on this? I've been pretty much on a different path than most around me all my life. This situation should be no different.
Have you read any Brian Greene or Mertin Rees?
L8R
--"After all is said and done, "Gravity Rules".--

• I knew Brian Greene - wandaqueen - June 1, 2004 - 00:43 UTC
  • Can someone explain me...? - qazws - June 1, 2004 - 09:27 UTC
    • I will try - wandaqueen - June 1, 2004 - 14:04 UTC
      • The Big Question - qazws - June 1, 2004 - 20:10 UTC
        • No such thing as infinity - wandaqueen - June 1, 2004 - 23:07 UTC
          • A reply - qazws - June 2, 2004 - 09:47 UTC
            • I can - yanniru - June 2, 2004 - 12:58 UTC
              • Never say never - qazws - June 2, 2004 - 13:33 UTC
                • Infinity cannot be observed - yanniru - June 2, 2004 - 14:13 UTC
                  • A naked singularity - qazws - June 2, 2004 - 16:31 UTC
                    • Here is obsrvable evidence that GR is incorrect - yanniru - June 2, 2004 - 19:15 UTC
                      • That is observable evidence that you... - bruce - June 3, 2004 - 05:53 UTC
                        • An acquaintance of mine says the samething - secretary - June 3, 2004 - 19:27 UTC
                          • They don't have a clue... - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 14:25 UTC
                            • Kerr may just be a non-symmetric solution - secretary - June 4, 2004 - 16:32 UTC
                              • Nobody is interested in cahill's work for a good reason. - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 21:43 UTC
                                • Put up or shut up - secretary - June 5, 2004 - 01:46 UTC
                                  • A little knowledge is a dangerous thing - wandaqueen - June 5, 2004 - 19:57 UTC
                                  • Stuff it... - bruce - June 6, 2004 - 01:23 UTC
                                    • Why are you not answering him - wandaqueen - June 6, 2004 - 01:33 UTC
                                      • I did answer him... - bruce - June 6, 2004 - 09:01 UTC
                      • Neither SST nor LQG is complete yet - qazws - June 3, 2004 - 14:02 UTC
                        • GR is not complete - secretary - June 4, 2004 - 01:23 UTC
                          • Does QM provides a mechanism to stop the collapse of matter? - qazws - June 4, 2004 - 09:17 UTC
                            • Yes- It's in Brain Greene's book - wandaqueen - June 4, 2004 - 10:39 UTC
                              • A full cicrcle - qazws - June 4, 2004 - 14:01 UTC
                                • The GUT theory is extant - wandaqueen - June 4, 2004 - 16:08 UTC
                                  • Thank you very much - qazws - June 4, 2004 - 17:03 UTC
                              • GR doesn't have a version of the.... - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 14:36 UTC
                                • general relativistic effects on a quantum field. - secretary - June 5, 2004 - 01:50 UTC
                          • Quantum mechanics isn't the.. - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 14:31 UTC
                            • A theory is complete if it includes all domains - secretary - June 5, 2004 - 12:49 UTC
                              • Puzzled about your use of the word complete. - wandaqueen - June 5, 2004 - 20:42 UTC