Never Say Never - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Never Say Never

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Gfjhgvfgb on June 2, 2004 13:33:37 UTC

Why can't infinities exist?Can you give me any PHYSICAL reason based on OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE that infinities don't exist?GR works,we have OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE for that.So,why don't infinities exist???
This question today is a little bit like some other issues in the physics not so long time ago.Then the people thought that space and time are absolute,there is no universal speed limit,being a particle and a wave in the same time is impossible and we can measure everything absolutely precisely.What happened with this believes in PHYSICS.

Follow Ups:

Infinity cannot be observed - yanniru - June 2, 2004 - 14:13 UTC
- A naked singularity - qazws - June 2, 2004 - 16:31 UTC
  - Here is obsrvable evidence that GR is incorrect - yanniru - June 2, 2004 - 19:15 UTC
    - That is observable evidence that you... - bruce - June 3, 2004 - 05:53 UTC
      - An acquaintance of mine says the samething - secretary - June 3, 2004 - 19:27 UTC
        
        They don't have a clue... - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 14:25 UTC
        
        Kerr may just be a non-symmetric solution - secretary - June 4, 2004 - 16:32 UTC
        
        Nobody is interested in cahill's work for a good reason. - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 21:43 UTC
        
        Put up or shut up - secretary - June 5, 2004 - 01:46 UTC
        
        A little knowledge is a dangerous thing - wandaqueen - June 5, 2004 - 19:57 UTC
        
        Stuff it... - bruce - June 6, 2004 - 01:23 UTC
        
        Why are you not answering him - wandaqueen - June 6, 2004 - 01:33 UTC
        
        I did answer him... - bruce - June 6, 2004 - 09:01 UTC
    - Neither SST nor LQG is complete yet - qazws - June 3, 2004 - 14:02 UTC
      - GR is not complete - secretary - June 4, 2004 - 01:23 UTC
        
        Does QM provides a mechanism to stop the collapse of matter? - qazws - June 4, 2004 - 09:17 UTC
        
        Yes- It's in Brain Greene's book - wandaqueen - June 4, 2004 - 10:39 UTC
        
        A full cicrcle - qazws - June 4, 2004 - 14:01 UTC
        
        The GUT theory is extant - wandaqueen - June 4, 2004 - 16:08 UTC
        
        Thank you very much - qazws - June 4, 2004 - 17:03 UTC
        
        GR doesn't have a version of the.... - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 14:36 UTC
        
        general relativistic effects on a quantum field. - secretary - June 5, 2004 - 01:50 UTC
        
        Quantum mechanics isn't the.. - bruce - June 4, 2004 - 14:31 UTC
        
        A theory is complete if it includes all domains - secretary - June 5, 2004 - 12:49 UTC
        
        Puzzled about your use of the word complete. - wandaqueen - June 5, 2004 - 20:42 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins