Gravitational vectors point toward the 'center of gravity' of the 'gravity generating mass'. The force vector acting on a body under acceleration points in the direction opposite to that of the acceleration vector. Thus the resultant gravitational vectors at all points in a region would converge on the center of gravity of the region. The force vectors at all points in an accelerating region would be parallel and opposite to the acceleration vector.

• center of gravity is an ambiguous term - sagefr0g - April 16, 2003 - 04:39 UTC
  • Gravity unambiguous - jetty - April 16, 2003 - 20:08 UTC
    • a plumb bob.... heh heh - sagefr0g - April 17, 2003 - 03:41 UTC
      • It’s a magic plumb bob. - duordi - April 17, 2003 - 17:00 UTC
        • Universal gravity - jetty - April 17, 2003 - 22:28 UTC
          • So gravity is not quantumized like other waves? - duordi - April 21, 2003 - 03:47 UTC
            • Eternity - jetty - April 21, 2003 - 22:27 UTC
              • Smaller is not simpler. - duordi - April 23, 2003 - 01:22 UTC
                • Infinite and eternal - jetty - April 23, 2003 - 12:18 UTC
                  • Interesting... - duordi - April 23, 2003 - 22:28 UTC
                    • Doubt - jetty - April 24, 2003 - 06:19 UTC
                      • Good approach - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 17:10 UTC
                        • Einstein - jetty - April 26, 2003 - 05:41 UTC
                          • Having a theory which matches known data is not a sin. - duordi - April 26, 2003 - 19:30 UTC
              • eternity still possible with black holes - sagefr0g - April 26, 2003 - 14:49 UTC
                • The unwritten assumption. - duordi - April 26, 2003 - 20:59 UTC
            • Quantized but not discrete - jetty - April 21, 2003 - 22:38 UTC
              • Does mass have an undividable particle? - duordi - April 23, 2003 - 01:31 UTC
                • considering the particle "zoo" - sagefr0g - April 23, 2003 - 09:51 UTC
                  • How about a mind bender. - duordi - April 23, 2003 - 23:12 UTC
                    • thats not only a mind bender - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 22:16 UTC
                • Electron and positron - jetty - April 23, 2003 - 12:23 UTC
                  • Are you saying gravity has no indivisible unit while mass does? - duordi - April 23, 2003 - 23:38 UTC
                    • Coexistent - jetty - April 24, 2003 - 06:24 UTC
                      • Do your ideas include any massless particles? - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 22:57 UTC
                        • No massless matter - jetty - April 26, 2003 - 05:45 UTC
      • Sophisticated machinery - jetty - April 17, 2003 - 22:25 UTC
        • sophisticated machinery is fine - sagefr0g - April 21, 2003 - 01:34 UTC
          • You have a point - jetty - April 21, 2003 - 03:00 UTC
            • and you have a point also - sagefr0g - April 22, 2003 - 02:15 UTC
              • Other points - jetty - April 23, 2003 - 12:26 UTC
                • alternative views.... hmm - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 02:31 UTC
                  • Heaver objects do fall faster. - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 03:45 UTC
                    • perhaps in a universe with only two objects - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 15:40 UTC
                      • Other objects pull both ways. - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 17:30 UTC
                        • those other massive objects "out there" - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 19:44 UTC
                          • Inertia is the attraction of a mass to its own gravity field. - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 22:49 UTC
                            • basketballs do not fall consistently - sagefr0g - April 25, 2003 - 03:52 UTC
                        • my bad - sagefr0g - April 25, 2003 - 02:32 UTC
                        • still digging at your equation... - sagefr0g - April 25, 2003 - 18:31 UTC
                          • I think I have a solution you will like. - duordi - April 25, 2003 - 20:49 UTC
                            • another wrinkle is that - sagefr0g - April 27, 2003 - 14:20 UTC
                              • You lost me on that one. - duordi - April 27, 2003 - 20:19 UTC
                                • drop a basketball from height X - sagefr0g - April 28, 2003 - 01:18 UTC
                                  • So your saying.... - duordi - April 29, 2003 - 01:53 UTC
                                    • uhmm - sagefr0g - April 30, 2003 - 22:15 UTC