Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Smaller Is Not Simpler.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Duane Eddy on April 23, 2003 01:22:40 UTC

You said:
The concept black hole is incompatible with infinite time. Everything would go into a black hole and all the black holes would come together and the universe would go steady state.

What if the universe is recreated on the other side ( or inside ) of the black hole?
It would seem very egotistical to require that everything must happen here.

You said:
If time is infinite, it would have happened already.

We may exist only in conjunction with this point in the universal existence. In other words, if it would have happened in the past we would have happened then too. If it would have happened in the future then we would have happened then also.

You said:
It hasn't. Therefore either time is not infinite or the black hole concept is wrong. I believe that time is infinite, therefore in my system the black hole concept is wrong. If there is no black hole there is no event horizon.

I donít think black holes exist either, but for different reasons.

You said:
I believe massively compacted aggregates of matter are instable, due to their electron-positron composition. Eventually under extreme compaction, one or more pairs of like particles will be so close together that repulsive force(s) will initiate fission.
If the repulsive force is inversely proportional to some power of the separation distance, imagine the force created by near zero separation.

Are you saying that fission will supply enough energy to straighten space allowing the energy to escape?
That would indicate a very structured energy form.
One pattern I have noticed when progressing to smaller and smaller objects is the complication of structure does not diminish.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins