Your understanding of that position is reasonable. There is an alternate understanding of that position at http://www.paias.com/paias/home/Science/Einstein/Ein2Detail.htm
I'd like to know your opinion of this material.

• alternative views.... hmm - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 02:31 UTC
  • Heaver objects do fall faster. - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 03:45 UTC
    • perhaps in a universe with only two objects - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 15:40 UTC
      • Other objects pull both ways. - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 17:30 UTC
        • those other massive objects "out there" - sagefr0g - April 24, 2003 - 19:44 UTC
          • Inertia is the attraction of a mass to its own gravity field. - duordi - April 24, 2003 - 22:49 UTC
            • basketballs do not fall consistently - sagefr0g - April 25, 2003 - 03:52 UTC
        • my bad - sagefr0g - April 25, 2003 - 02:32 UTC
        • still digging at your equation... - sagefr0g - April 25, 2003 - 18:31 UTC
          • I think I have a solution you will like. - duordi - April 25, 2003 - 20:49 UTC
            • another wrinkle is that - sagefr0g - April 27, 2003 - 14:20 UTC
              • You lost me on that one. - duordi - April 27, 2003 - 20:19 UTC
                • drop a basketball from height X - sagefr0g - April 28, 2003 - 01:18 UTC
                  • So your saying.... - duordi - April 29, 2003 - 01:53 UTC
                    • uhmm - sagefr0g - April 30, 2003 - 22:15 UTC