Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
1. 2. 3.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on January 14, 2003 16:02:31 UTC

1. Magbetic fields are blocked by conductors, such as coils used to shield equipment

2. Opposite polarizations do interfere, but that is not considered an anti-particle by physicists.

Victor M. Urbina's model has been proposed by others who he has not referenced, notably Richard Richardson. He reasoning for why such a two charge model is needed is howevr quite erroneous. I will explain in detail if you wish.

EM waves and photons are dual. Gravitons and gravitational waves are dual. Particles of different spin number cannot be dual to each other.

3. There are standard ways to measure the many forms of energy and the one form of gravity.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins