Back to Home

UFO Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | UFO Discussion and Tracking | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Re: Re: Roswell The Only Real Evidence?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Jim Schings on January 15, 2001 21:29:48 UTC

Well none hold up well, but there is Rendlesham Forest, the Mexico City sightings, Gulf Breeze, and lots more. While all have no real evidence, their currency at least makes them worthy of investigation. Roswell was nothing in history until the 70's when the first book was written. Prior to that there was nothing. Witnesses were all interviewed 25 years after the event. No physical evidence ever turned up and the witness's stories have changed dozens of times. In the case of Roswell, do you really believe the government could keep a secret through 8 presidencies, literally hundreds of people involved? Heck they can't even keep a presidential romance secret.

You could find books on building the atomic bomb within 4 years of it's production.

Roswell is hokum. As I suspect all the others are.

Jim


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins