Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Was Raised Reading Shakespeare And Dostoevsky.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on August 2, 2001 16:06:57 UTC

May be that is why I use logic to analyse and why I pay more attention to the essence and to the content, while others (like Aurino) pay most attention to the form (shiny package appearance) and do not trouble to go futher.

It is critical to have ability of analysing and clearly defining things. For example, most believers do not even know WHAT they believe in (i.e., what is god). Thus they have serious trouble explaining ANYTHING about their favorite gods (allahs, etc.). Indeed, practically all of them do not even know WHAT they are talking about (what are gods). Correct me if you (or anyone around) DOES know.

Without analysis, logic and knowledge of math/physics the only choice you have is to rely on "smelling talent" which seems to give you the smell of Santa in every dark (to you) corner despite plenty of light in any physics/math textbook explaining those corners and phenomena in great details without need of any Santa.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins