In order to avoid ambiguity. Then we can discuss to what degree wave nature of everything (Heizenberg uncertainty principle) makes phenomena predictable, or discuss what is self-consciouseness and if it contradicts to any mathematical law.

• A practical, logical, non-dogmatic approach - aurino - July 5, 2001 - 20:44 UTC
  • Answer on all your questions depend on what you call consciouse. - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 21:08 UTC
    • More about consciouseness. - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 22:46 UTC
      • A computer is not conscience. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:16 UTC
      • Another thing about Computers. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 01:22 UTC
        • Another thing about biology - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 01:40 UTC
          • Human's are no where near that simple - highvoltage - July 6, 2001 - 01:48 UTC
            • I oversimplified, but the premise is the same - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 02:08 UTC
              • Not exaclty. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 04:03 UTC
                • I agree with you on the level of complexity - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 04:17 UTC
                  • Not crossed wires - highvoltage - July 6, 2001 - 05:39 UTC
                  • I disagree about you saying that pople have no free-will. - motumos - July 6, 2001 - 05:50 UTC
                    • Actually atomic bomb was against Stalin's growing power. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 16:58 UTC
                      • It was a choice nontheless - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 00:23 UTC
                      • Even you typing this reply was a choice, not a necessity. - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 00:34 UTC
                        • Not neccesarily - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 02:34 UTC
                          • I don't think so - highvoltage - July 7, 2001 - 03:32 UTC
                          • Free will works regardless of normal DNA in humans. - caprinicus - July 7, 2001 - 03:52 UTC
                            • I'll try and explain - stormcrow - July 7, 2001 - 13:55 UTC
                              • Wrong again. - caprinicus - July 8, 2001 - 13:08 UTC
                                • Omni-Post - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 00:17 UTC
                                  • God-days may be true - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 05:22 UTC
                                    • Sure, back it up - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 13:40 UTC
                                      • God days.... - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 17:07 UTC
                                        • I see your point, but doesn't this prove the Bible's ambiguity? - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 19:31 UTC
                                          • Doens't prove the bible's ambiguity - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 20:16 UTC
                                            • Bible is full of impossible phenomena. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 20:43 UTC
                                              • again proof - terry - November 15, 2001 - 12:36 UTC
                                • Caprinicus - you don't know how brain, universe, etc works. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 18:43 UTC
          • Here's the difference - aurino - July 6, 2001 - 13:55 UTC
            • NOT ALL BRAIN CELLS are speech, image and sound related. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
    • Can you answer the question or not? - aurino - July 6, 2001 - 12:58 UTC
      • Am I conscious? How do I know if consciouseness is undefined? - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 17:14 UTC
        • A surreal dialogue - aurino - July 6, 2001 - 17:35 UTC
          • Primitive example. - alexander - July 6, 2001 - 17:41 UTC
          • Even though I disagree, that was pretty funny. (nt) - stormcrow - July 6, 2001 - 17:47 UTC