Hi Alex,

I asked you this question further down but you did not answer it. You have posted your same statement several times since then so I want to ask you this question again. I hope you will answer.

I am not much of a mathematician and not at all a scientist, so I am looking for an explanation which doesn't assume a deep knowledge of physics. You said

>>>We even know, HOW all natural laws, most known forces and some fundamental objects (like a photon) come from math.

• Paul, are you barking up the wrong tree? - harvey1 - June 26, 2001 - 02:17 UTC
  • Grrr...yap, yap - paulm - June 26, 2001 - 05:15 UTC
    • Why do you think a sentient creator is neccesary? - stormcrow - June 27, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
      • But what about time? - highvoltage - June 27, 2001 - 06:07 UTC
        • Time did have a beginning, I think - stormcrow - June 27, 2001 - 14:13 UTC
          • Then what is time? - highvoltage - June 27, 2001 - 19:10 UTC
            • It's 12:05 - bobsal - June 28, 2001 - 16:08 UTC
          • Here's another view - harvey1 - June 27, 2001 - 22:23 UTC
            • Oops! - harvey1 - June 27, 2001 - 22:28 UTC
            • Wouldn't time universally slow down then? - highvoltage - June 28, 2001 - 08:30 UTC
              • The velocity of the expansion is INCREASING - stormcrow - June 28, 2001 - 17:46 UTC
                • Very interesting - highvoltage - June 28, 2001 - 20:48 UTC
                  • In addition - mrobbins1 - June 29, 2001 - 18:45 UTC
• Answer to Paul R. Martin about math origin of all natural laws. - alexander - June 28, 2001 - 20:04 UTC
  • But space is not symmetric - yanniru - June 29, 2001 - 11:20 UTC
    • I think, math is more fundamental. - alexander - July 5, 2001 - 23:06 UTC