Time Did Have A Beginning, I Think - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Time Did Have A Beginning, I Think

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on June 27, 2001 14:13:29 UTC

At the Big Bang. There was no "before" the big bang, it started time. (I know, an explosion suggests causality, ask someone more grounded in physics here, like Alex, to explain it better.)

I wouldn't understand how our laws just appeared from nothing, along with matter, energy, etc.

Lack of understanding is not proof of God. Why believe in him until we find or don't find him?

Follow Ups:

Then what is time? - highvoltage - June 27, 2001 - 19:10 UTC
- It's 12:05 - bobsal - June 28, 2001 - 16:08 UTC
Here's another view - harvey1 - June 27, 2001 - 22:23 UTC
- Oops! - harvey1 - June 27, 2001 - 22:28 UTC
- Wouldn't time universally slow down then? - highvoltage - June 28, 2001 - 08:30 UTC
  - The velocity of the expansion is INCREASING - stormcrow - June 28, 2001 - 17:46 UTC
    - Very interesting - highvoltage - June 28, 2001 - 20:48 UTC
      - In addition - mrobbins1 - June 29, 2001 - 18:45 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins