|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Wouldn't Time Universally Slow Down Then?
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Mike Banks on June 28, 2001 08:30:53 UTC |
Time slows down at higher volocity or gravity. So if there indeed was a big bang, wouldn't this mean that at the first billion years or so time was much faster, slowing down to what we have now. If this is true then wouldn't the universe be younger than 15 or so billion years if measured by our time? It seems there would be no accurate way of measuring time if the general time of the universe is always changing.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |