I Always Thought The Debate Was On The .. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Always Thought The Debate Was On The ..

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bruce on September 26, 2003 08:13:41 UTC

adequacy of quantum theory to describe nature...
Einstein is saying that consistent theoretical predictions which are empirically verifiable, and repeatable, can be considered real in some universal sense. We can universally agree that a theory consistently makes the same prediction [wrt some aspect of nature] and that it can be [and has been] empirically verified in repeatable tests.

Follow Ups:

along that vein - sagefr0g - September 26, 2003 - 09:46 UTC
- The EPR effect - yanniru - September 26, 2003 - 11:25 UTC
  - This is ludicrous... - bruce - September 26, 2003 - 20:39 UTC
    - I expect more respect from you - yanniru - September 29, 2003 - 04:21 UTC
    - Einstein also thought it was ludicrous - yanniru - September 29, 2003 - 13:27 UTC
      - When you say in a sense QM proved.. - bruce - September 29, 2003 - 18:35 UTC
        
        College physics - yanniru - September 29, 2003 - 21:44 UTC
        
        In my amateurish opinion... - aurino_ - September 30, 2003 - 14:35 UTC
        
        You are correct - yanniru - September 30, 2003 - 16:45 UTC
        
        This isn't what you initially said.. - bruce - September 30, 2003 - 20:16 UTC
        
        What about... - harvey1 - September 30, 2003 - 20:54 UTC
        
        Without going through this convoluted.. - bruce - October 1, 2003 - 20:59 UTC
        
        Let me ask a question - harvey1 - October 1, 2003 - 23:53 UTC
        
        The mistake in the thought experiment.. - bruce - October 2, 2003 - 02:12 UTC
        
        Is it really a mistake? - harvey1 - October 2, 2003 - 14:24 UTC
        
        The other paper - harvey1 - October 2, 2003 - 14:26 UTC
        
        Just exactly why... - bruce - October 2, 2003 - 19:45 UTC
        
        Taking it a step further... - harvey1 - October 2, 2003 - 21:17 UTC
        
        The light minute has everything to do with.. - bruce - October 2, 2003 - 22:30 UTC
        
        Maybe you could clarify? - harvey1 - October 3, 2003 - 02:11 UTC
        
        Actually... - bruce - October 3, 2003 - 04:03 UTC
        
        How about we consider what we know at the two events... - harvey1 - October 3, 2003 - 15:18 UTC
        
        The thought experiment... - bruce - October 3, 2003 - 20:53 UTC
        
        Keep in mind.. - bruce - October 3, 2003 - 20:57 UTC
        
        Isn't SR agnostic about these things? - harvey1 - October 3, 2003 - 22:11 UTC
        
        I have to leave... - bruce - October 4, 2003 - 00:33 UTC
        
        Here is what I initially said - yanniru - October 1, 2003 - 00:16 UTC
        
        Relativity predicts that information.. - bruce - October 1, 2003 - 20:53 UTC
        
        Who cares about information - yanniru - October 1, 2003 - 23:41 UTC
        
        Whats wrong with you...? - bruce - October 2, 2003 - 02:24 UTC
        
        I am reporting you to the forum host - yanniru - October 2, 2003 - 04:10 UTC
        
        Good for you... - bruce - October 2, 2003 - 04:49 UTC
        
        Undergraduate... - bruce - September 30, 2003 - 20:08 UTC
        
        All physicists think EPR failed to destroy QM - yanniru - October 1, 2003 - 00:25 UTC
        
        I'm 57 years old... - bruce - October 1, 2003 - 23:22 UTC
- Reality is a fuzzy concept - aurino_ - September 26, 2003 - 16:02 UTC
  - going by the dictionary - sagefr0g - September 26, 2003 - 20:58 UTC
    - Lets get this straight... - bruce - September 26, 2003 - 21:02 UTC
      - Absolute reality - sfnative - September 26, 2003 - 23:00 UTC
        
        Thats certainly not absolute... - bruce - September 27, 2003 - 00:41 UTC
        
        Cognition != events - sfnative - September 27, 2003 - 19:22 UTC
        
        more... - sagefr0g - September 28, 2003 - 17:30 UTC
        
        Bohm Theory - yanniru - September 29, 2003 - 12:25 UTC
      - getting something straight would be great - sagefr0g - September 26, 2003 - 23:48 UTC
        
        What do you think 'true' reality... - bruce - September 27, 2003 - 01:02 UTC
        
        "true" reality - sagefr0g - September 28, 2003 - 00:54 UTC
        
        True reality as you just defined it... - bruce - September 28, 2003 - 04:30 UTC
        
        Try this Bruce! - dolphin - September 28, 2003 - 10:04 UTC
        
        does our discussion... - sagefr0g - September 28, 2003 - 17:15 UTC
        
        No... - bruce - September 29, 2003 - 02:10 UTC
        
        ok - sagefr0g - September 29, 2003 - 22:28 UTC
    - You're wrong - aurino_ - September 27, 2003 - 16:14 UTC
      - oh yeah? well, you're abusive and a liar. - quiet - October 12, 2003 - 23:07 UTC
  - More ad nauseam... - bruce - September 26, 2003 - 20:58 UTC
    - When it comes to God and Science.... - quiet - October 12, 2003 - 23:07 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins