It seems to me that an intent of any intellectual endeavor, would be to bolster a forum to challenge the logic of said endeavor. Isn't it reasonable that governments, universities or societies promote platforms that debate their very existence. Without reproof, how can anything have creedance. Humanity appears to be the greatest example of an intellectual endeavor. However, our quest for resolution often seems to examine the journey, but never the reason for the jonrney. If humanity is the essence of omnipotence and the sanctioned (thought) of the Eternal mind; then, does God need to be challenged to have purpose. Or should the question be; what is the purpose of (thought)?

• I Think You Are And You Think - pmartin - July 13, 2003 - 18:36 UTC
  • I am before I think unless I am the prime mover - kantolfir2 - July 13, 2003 - 19:17 UTC
    • You Are, So Get Moving! - pmartin - July 13, 2003 - 19:49 UTC
  • response to Paul - origin - July 14, 2003 - 03:49 UTC
    • And, Back to You, Stanley - pmartin - July 14, 2003 - 04:51 UTC
• or how about this one... - smartguy - July 13, 2003 - 19:32 UTC
  • No Problem - pmartin - July 13, 2003 - 20:05 UTC
    • But Paul, something about "all the way down" troubles me... - smartguy - July 14, 2003 - 04:18 UTC
      • Would You Believe, Part Way Down? - pmartin - July 14, 2003 - 05:02 UTC