"If you are NOT saying your opinion should have jurisdiction over someone else's, then you accept the finding of the Supreme Court."

My opinions do not have jurisdiction over anyone elses, and I accept the finding of the supreme court. However, I disagree with them, and hope they will change the laws.

"But I don't think it's right to condemn folks on subjects about which you can't even explain your beliefs. And you did condemn them. You said they murdered."

Can't explain my beliefs? What did I not explain?
I do not 'condemn' anyone, I give my opinion and what I think about the issue. I'm not sending them to hell.

"But since we know that most prenatal children are only forming their minds after their brains achieve significant wiring thresholds, it seems likely that a younger foetus does not experience any regret or deprivation at all if the parents feel there was no place being prepared."

So? Are you saying it is alright to kill someone if they do not feel 'regret or deprivation'? What about people born with mental problems? Or people in a coma? 'They won't feel it, so let's just kill them'. No.

"If you are wrong, you have violated the Commandment against "Bearing false witness against thy neighbor"

Oh please. I did not bear any witness to anyone, and it is not false. That 'fetus' will become a baby eventually, therefore in my mind it is murder. I'm not condemning anyone, nor am I going to shoot a doctor who preforms these abortions. I'm just giving my opinion. Nothing wrong with that.

KC2GWX

• Your way of talking is why we need attorneys - carefuluniverse - June 15, 2002 - 08:18 UTC
  • Oh please. - kc2gwx - June 15, 2002 - 12:44 UTC
    • We believe you're 16...but that's beside the point - carefuluniverse - June 15, 2002 - 15:31 UTC
• Can't separate 'mental problems from having walnut-sized brain - carefuluniverse - June 15, 2002 - 15:19 UTC
  • I talk to YOU...and you have mental problems - carefuluniverse - June 15, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
    • Reply to Michael W. Pearson - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 03:17 UTC
      • Soul? - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 03:54 UTC
        • not adequate - kantolfir2 - June 16, 2002 - 03:56 UTC
          • Yes - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 07:00 UTC
        • so....you think women carry a "1year old infant" inside them? - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 04:16 UTC
          • reference to 1 year old or 3 month old..was .from conception? - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 04:17 UTC
            • 1-year-old was using common usage - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 04:33 UTC
              • We had been discussing the human foetus... - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 05:33 UTC
                • Innocence - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 06:17 UTC
                  • a note on purpose - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 17:23 UTC
                    • Sex and the thrill of life - carefuluniverse - June 17, 2002 - 01:42 UTC
                      • Until I recall - dolphin - June 19, 2002 - 04:36 UTC
                        • defining "natural" various ways allows a variety of "naturals" - quiet - June 19, 2002 - 05:09 UTC
                    • Reply to each point - dolphin - June 19, 2002 - 04:31 UTC
                      • I agree "There is a way of being alive that is so incredible - quiet - June 19, 2002 - 05:13 UTC
                        • One is responsible for oneself - dolphin - June 21, 2002 - 06:05 UTC
          • Meaning of "soul"? - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 05:40 UTC
            • point of procedure - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 06:07 UTC
              • Point noted - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 06:31 UTC
                • we only have posted about six posts each in this exchange. - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 20:29 UTC
                  • I did respond - dolphin - June 19, 2002 - 04:50 UTC
      • Please describe your logical proposal in a concise statement - kantolfir2 - June 16, 2002 - 03:54 UTC
        • Human life begins at conception; soul is present - dolphin - June 16, 2002 - 06:46 UTC
          • you have an opinion, not assembled, with reasons full of holes - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 20:26 UTC
            • Hi Alan - carefuluniverse - June 16, 2002 - 20:26 UTC
            • Insufficient information? - dolphin - June 19, 2002 - 04:00 UTC
              • all the other stuff aside... - quiet - June 19, 2002 - 05:28 UTC
                • 4 cells old - dolphin - June 21, 2002 - 07:17 UTC
                  • that gets old - quiet - June 21, 2002 - 16:29 UTC
                    • Adult...kid.....what's the difference? - kc2gwx - June 21, 2002 - 17:48 UTC
                      • That question aside....you coulda jumped in any time. - quiet - June 21, 2002 - 18:30 UTC
                    • Consequences - dolphin - June 23, 2002 - 08:59 UTC
                  • Speaking of absurd - quiet - June 21, 2002 - 16:40 UTC
                    • Reply - dolphin - June 23, 2002 - 09:20 UTC
                      • Not pulling the punches this time - spazcon - June 23, 2002 - 23:03 UTC
                        • Talking about a range - dolphin - June 24, 2002 - 00:37 UTC
                          • But the range of our disagreement did not include six months - spazcon - June 24, 2002 - 04:22 UTC
                      • "There is no evidence" - spazcon - June 23, 2002 - 23:13 UTC
                        • Evidence? - dolphin - June 24, 2002 - 00:47 UTC
                          • You have a whole bag full of cliches - spazcon - June 24, 2002 - 03:04 UTC
                      • Catholic that you are - spazcon - June 23, 2002 - 23:14 UTC
                      • Catholic that you are - spazcon - June 23, 2002 - 23:14 UTC
                        • I know that - dolphin - June 24, 2002 - 01:03 UTC
                      • And I do not think your academic training is good in these areas - spazcon - June 23, 2002 - 23:53 UTC
                        • ???????????? - dolphin - June 24, 2002 - 01:01 UTC
                          • Bad grammar? - spazcon - June 24, 2002 - 03:09 UTC
                            • How about? - dolphin - June 24, 2002 - 05:00 UTC