Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on June 6, 2002 03:41:26 UTC

"I think only humans have souls."

Why not chimps, who share 99% of our DNA? Why not dolphins, who exibit intelligence, group dynamics, and higher brain functions? If a human were to be born with such mental, genetic, and physical disabilities that we was inferior to a dog, would you say he has a soul? Yes? In that case, on what criteria do we base the handing out of souls?

Also, I think you would have to admit that animals experience emotions, pain, happiness, etc. (at least the more complex mammals) What kind of cruel injustice, then, is it to deny them a soul? (assuming we have them)

"My answer to what makes a think living or not is the search for food. I think if an organism searches for food or a way of life, it is alive. Rocks do not, bacteria do."

Behavior is only part of the issue. Here's the problem: if you reduce a living thing more and more to its base components (human -> system -> organ -> cell -> organelle -> DNA chain -> amino acids -> carbon molecules) at what point does it cease to be organic? I'm saying that there is no definable point.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins