You Hit On The Reason For Religion - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

You Hit On The Reason For Religion

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on January 16, 2002 14:27:33 UTC

Unfortunately most religions, in my opinion do not answer the question of why we are here adequately. I think some of the posts on this forum come as close to such an answer as any religion.

Follow Ups:

Dr. MLKing Jr. 's "How to Use the Bible in Modern . . . ." - quiet - January 16, 2002 - 21:00 UTC
Why we are here. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 16:34 UTC
- So does that mean - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 17:34 UTC
  - Basicly, yes, we (humans, aliesn, etc.) obey same laws. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 17:49 UTC
    - So, does this mean - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 18:38 UTC
      - I would say, set of equations. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 19:52 UTC
        
        Forgor a question mark - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 20:00 UTC
        
        What restricts math to macroscopic systems? - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 20:01 UTC
        
        Math works for all systems. Microscopic, macro, etc. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 20:12 UTC
        
        So... - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 20:35 UTC
        
        Symmetries. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 20:48 UTC
        
        My point is... - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 21:05 UTC
        
        It probably can be derived too. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 22:03 UTC
        
        Two ways of approaching this - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 22:21 UTC
        
        I really do not understand this. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 22:43 UTC
        
        Do you agree that... - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 23:13 UTC
        
        Galaxies are not identical, like particles. - alexander - January 18, 2002 - 00:15 UTC
        
        That's not the point, though - harvey1 - January 18, 2002 - 17:25 UTC
        
        Harvey, you are again incorrect. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:07 UTC
        
        What a single principle gives you - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 14:37 UTC
        
        Correction.Least action principle follows from f=ma,not vicevers - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:20 UTC
        
        re: least action principle - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 22:33 UTC
        
        Please, define energy (or action) without dp/dt. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 06:35 UTC
        
        We've lost our math HTML tags - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 13:59 UTC
Interesting comment, Yanniru. (nt) - dolphin - January 27, 2002 - 03:57 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins