Our fundamental particles are waves, thus obeys math of waves (=uncertainty principle). Macroscopic objects (humans, planets, etc) consists of a bunch of microscopic objects and thus obey math of MANY waves (=classic mechanics as average of big ensemble of quantum onjects).

• So... - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 20:35 UTC
  • Symmetries. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 20:48 UTC
    • My point is... - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 21:05 UTC
      • It probably can be derived too. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 22:03 UTC
        • Two ways of approaching this - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 22:21 UTC
          • I really do not understand this. - alexander - January 17, 2002 - 22:43 UTC
            • Do you agree that... - harvey1 - January 17, 2002 - 23:13 UTC
              • Galaxies are not identical, like particles. - alexander - January 18, 2002 - 00:15 UTC
            • That's not the point, though - harvey1 - January 18, 2002 - 17:25 UTC
              • Harvey, you are again incorrect. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:07 UTC
            • What a single principle gives you - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 14:37 UTC
              • Correction.Least action principle follows from f=ma,not vicevers - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:20 UTC
            • re: least action principle - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 22:33 UTC
              • Please, define energy (or action) without dp/dt. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 06:35 UTC
          • We've lost our math HTML tags - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 13:59 UTC