Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
So...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on January 17, 2002 20:35:58 UTC

Does that mean there is equations 'out there' that simplify human behavior in a manner that SU(2) does for the isospin of the nuclei or SU(3) does for the eightfold way, etc? In other words, is there some SU(10)? that shows that so many galaxies should be in the universe? If you say no, just remember that SU(3) tells us that there is a reason why certain quantum particles exist (i.e., to meet the demands that the symmetry group representation requires).

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins