lawyers, construction and everyone I know of ( that’s human ) has psychological problems.
It’s part of what we are.

This “how dare you insinuate...” attitude seems very defensive and illogical.

I have noticed that your comments are very logically except when they deal with the scientific community. Free discussion about counterproductive elements in its composition is necessary for the community to remain efficient.

One mistake in 100 years is nothing to be afraid of.
Refusing to discuss the possibility will only indicate that there is a willingness to sacrifice logic “for the good of the scientific community”.

I can only hope for the “good of the community” as a whole, that this attitude is not prevalent.

I understand an alcoholic has problems admitting they have problems.
Preventing someone from asking them hard questions does not help them, it hurts them.
( Please don’t accuse me insinuating someone an alcoholic, this is only intended as an example.)

• Machiavelli seems very defensive and illogical - kantolfir2 - November 26, 2002 - 04:02 UTC
  • Or he just had a bad day. *nt* - duordi - November 26, 2002 - 05:12 UTC
    • Or, for months he has been playing the same note - theloopypath - November 26, 2002 - 17:43 UTC
• I'm going to take a deep breath - cosmotiger - November 26, 2002 - 21:40 UTC
  • There still may not be - harvey1 - November 26, 2002 - 22:48 UTC
    • Possibly - cosmotiger - November 27, 2002 - 00:16 UTC
      • the whole menagerie will be back - quiet - November 27, 2002 - 04:49 UTC
      • We have evidence - harvey1 - November 27, 2002 - 16:50 UTC
        • Bruce - bruce - November 27, 2002 - 19:57 UTC
          • The conclusion based on evidence is inconclusive - harvey1 - November 27, 2002 - 21:47 UTC
            • Harv - bruce - November 27, 2002 - 21:54 UTC
              • See my post just below (to Nicholas) nt - harvey1 - November 27, 2002 - 22:09 UTC
        • Link Please - cosmotiger - November 27, 2002 - 19:59 UTC
          • Aren't you gonna call me a crackpot first? - harvey1 - November 27, 2002 - 21:38 UTC
            • Caveat - harvey1 - November 27, 2002 - 21:42 UTC
            • There really isn't... - bruce - November 27, 2002 - 23:02 UTC
              • There are philosophical problems - harvey1 - November 28, 2002 - 00:10 UTC
                • Good for the Philosopher.... - bruce - November 28, 2002 - 15:08 UTC
                  • That's not an answer - harvey1 - November 28, 2002 - 16:17 UTC
                    • The answer was find... - bruce - November 28, 2002 - 21:04 UTC
                      • We don't need to treat SR as an approximation - harvey1 - November 29, 2002 - 05:41 UTC
                        • Correction - harvey1 - November 29, 2002 - 05:42 UTC
                • Possible Solution - cosmotiger - November 28, 2002 - 22:26 UTC
                  • Playing with the interpretation - harvey1 - November 29, 2002 - 06:58 UTC
                    • Correction - harvey1 - November 29, 2002 - 07:05 UTC
                      • How about this? - duordi - November 29, 2002 - 21:09 UTC
                    • Clarification - cosmotiger - November 30, 2002 - 05:37 UTC
            • Thanks - cosmotiger - November 28, 2002 - 18:50 UTC
  • "My anger is not defensiveness I assure you. " - quiet - November 27, 2002 - 04:55 UTC
    • that was a quote from Nicholas' post - theloopypath - November 27, 2002 - 18:37 UTC
  • My motives are as pure as the pastors daughters on Sunday morn. - duordi - November 28, 2002 - 00:25 UTC
    • Alright - cosmotiger - November 28, 2002 - 18:45 UTC
      • Thanks thats just what I was asking for.*nt* - duordi - November 29, 2002 - 14:07 UTC
      • Not all right - quiet - November 29, 2002 - 18:18 UTC
      • Your socialist herd-mentality fails to overturn high standards - quiet - November 29, 2002 - 18:33 UTC
        • How would you set things up?*nt* - duordi - November 29, 2002 - 19:37 UTC
          • I used to weigh in, however lightly, with my own version - quiet - November 29, 2002 - 20:51 UTC
            • Then here is my thoughts. - duordi - November 29, 2002 - 22:33 UTC
              • Neat! - kantolfir2 - November 29, 2002 - 23:12 UTC
                • Imagine the public understanding physics. - duordi - November 30, 2002 - 02:42 UTC
                  • This would be great... - cosmotiger - November 30, 2002 - 06:44 UTC
              • On that issue - cosmotiger - November 30, 2002 - 06:14 UTC
                • I got a rush of good vibes/painkilling hormones from reading it - quiet - November 30, 2002 - 06:29 UTC
• On this subject... - bruce - November 27, 2002 - 04:53 UTC
  • See my motives are pure... above *nt* - duordi - November 28, 2002 - 00:58 UTC