Science Is The Method Of Determining Truth - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Science Is The Method Of Determining Truth

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rich on February 15, 2001 21:59:35 UTC

For every ideal in the universe, there are possibly thousands to millions of possible truths, but there lays only one actual truth. When science scrutinizes itself, it does so only to get closer to the truth of the matter at hand.

Religion is stagnent. The bible is truth PERIOD!!! With such a view, it is incapable of adjusting to our ability to comprehend the universe, to comprehend each other.

Science's flexibility is what keeps it going. Knowledge, as with sewerage, has the degree of flow as the key. The quicker the flow, the more aeration and proper cycles go on and there is no foul degree to it. Let it stagnate and then a foul stench arises from it. This sounds like religion.

Follow Ups:

Re: Science is the method of determining truth - blnelsonusa - February 16, 2001 - 00:02 UTC
- Re: Re: Science is the method of determining truth - stormcrow - February 16, 2001 - 01:06 UTC
  - A Perfunctory Reading - blnelsonusa - February 16, 2001 - 03:50 UTC
    - Re: A Perfunctory Reading - stormcrow - February 16, 2001 - 04:23 UTC
      - Oh, and one more thing (or two) - stormcrow - February 16, 2001 - 04:34 UTC
        
        Re: Oh, and one more thing (or two) - yanniru - February 16, 2001 - 13:12 UTC
        
        Mr or Dr Nelson? - alexander - February 16, 2001 - 13:19 UTC
        
        Re: Mr or Dr Nelson? - miltionh12 - February 16, 2001 - 14:03 UTC
        
        Not Dr Nelson? May be, Master at least? In what? - alexander - February 16, 2001 - 19:46 UTC
        
        Re: Not Dr Nelson? May be, Master at least? In what? - blnelsonusa - February 16, 2001 - 21:44 UTC
        
        Wher would we be without science? - alexander - February 17, 2001 - 03:06 UTC
        
        Maybe... - stormcrow - February 16, 2001 - 21:36 UTC
        
        Re: Maybe... - yanniru - February 16, 2001 - 22:00 UTC
        
        That's true - stormcrow - February 17, 2001 - 03:25 UTC
        
        Disagree. You never know what new research may bring - alexander - February 17, 2001 - 03:55 UTC
        
        Heck Einstein had to wait... - richard - February 17, 2001 - 23:53 UTC
        
        Re: Heck Einstein had to wait... - yanniru - February 19, 2001 - 15:33 UTC
        
        Einstein never won prize for relativity. - alexander - February 20, 2001 - 02:21 UTC
        
        I stand corrected. - richard - February 20, 2001 - 17:17 UTC
        
        Swedesh Nobel Commetee - alexander - February 20, 2001 - 19:18 UTC
        
        Re: Swedesh Nobel Commetee - richard - February 20, 2001 - 21:11 UTC
- Reposting an earlier comment you... - richard - February 16, 2001 - 02:57 UTC
- Re: Re: Science is the method of determining truth - richard - February 20, 2001 - 17:20 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins